So you are saying that since Paige Pierce agreed with her and asked the camera man to move, she would have been within her rights to wait until the distraction was out of the way?
Yes, she would have.
If the guy was a distraction, and the group agreed that he was a distraction, there's nothing compelling Cat to throw in that situation. She's at liberty to wait until the distraction resolves itself. No different than if a random pedestrian wandered through (as is likely to happen in a public park like that). No one would fault her for waiting.
I agree. But people want to take the report of one particular instance and over-analyze it. It's the internet way.It feels like there were more than one thing that happened to her