• Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
    It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)

What would you want to see in an unsanctioned event that isnt allowed in a PDGA event

Just a matter of curiosity really...What sorts of things would you want to see in a unsanctioned event that would not be allowed or normal in a PDGA event? The first thing I was thinking was offering the ams the option of a cash payout...

Wheels and Turbo Putts and Regular Frisbees and pie plates and other discs not approved for no good reason :\

Also cash payouts for everyone over 18 like it's bowling :p
 
Honestly, the PDGA, sanctioning and rules do not inhibit, the unbridled joy that disc golf gives me. I am not interested in wacky rules and formats. I enjoy being outside, at a nice course, challenging my athletic prowess against the course. I appreciate a well run, organized and on time event. I like playing tournaments on kempt courses that have had some attention, before the event. I appreciate some small amenities....doughnuts, weather protection, good parking. I love a short walk to my first hole. Quick check in and payouts. PDGA sanctioning does not prohibit these.
 
You could probably split the possible replies into two categories:

(1) PDGA-like events, sidestepping a particular rule (i.e., cash payouts to Ams).

(2) More casual events, with things like mulligans and throwing-style restrictions.
 
When I used to run Trilogy Challenges I used our local wooded pitch n putt (every wooded hole is between 125 and 210 ft with minimal undergrowth) to run events I tagged as "Trilogy Challenge Parmelee Park: Mando Frenzy."

I would establish mandatories on every hole, with no penalty besides going to the drop-zone which was established basically next to the mandatory so that players could advance on their next shot. Some of the mandos were ridiculously tight, some forced players to play out away from any conventional line... Beyond using excessive mandos, at the time I was able to take advantage of the fact that the Trilogy Challenge allows the TD to keep a portion of the entry fees and the fact that I was sponsored and could make small orders at wholesale prices to put CTP prizes on every hole.

Players would also get a chance to "learn" the mandos because I would run the events as flex-start 2-round events where only your best round counted for your score. (there were also prize packages for the top finishers)
 
Allow the use of sport rings to help even out the distance difference in players within a division. If players can reach a hole with a disc, they won't use a ring. But those who can't reach it with a disc may be able to reach it with a ring. Even though their accuracy might be less, they at least have a chance to get close on some throws.
 
You could probably split the possible replies into two categories:

(1) PDGA-like events, sidestepping a particular rule (i.e., cash payouts to Ams).

These are the responses I was more or less expecting or hoping for. Y'all were supposed to read my mind daggumit.

(2) More casual events, with things like mulligans and throwing-style restrictions.

These are the responses I should've anticipated. I should've read your minds...on second thought...no.

Either way, some of this has been some entertaining and good ideas. Been contemplating running a PDGA-ish tournament but without the PDGA restrictions. I'm kind of getting the vibe from the locals this might be desirable. Sort of akin to the USDGC...

-Dave
 
Allow the use of sport rings to help even out the distance difference in players within a division. If players can reach a hole with a disc, they won't use a ring. But those who can't reach it with a disc may be able to reach it with a ring. Even though their accuracy might be less, they at least have a chance to get close on some throws.

A skilled thrower could also exploit this too, adding even more separation.

This was what I was referring to with my comment about holes in the disc — modifications to the flight plate could usher in a new frontier in competition if anyone actually wanted to see people throw really far.
 
A skilled thrower could also exploit this too, adding even more separation.

This was what I was referring to with my comment about holes in the disc — modifications to the flight plate could usher in a new frontier in competition if anyone actually wanted to see people throw really far.
The idea is not to make longer holes, but existing holes become more reachable sometimes by players who can't reach them with a disc. As a test, I had two active women disc golfers (5+ years playing) over age 60 throw their drivers in an open field for distance. Their max throws are in the 120-135 ft range and they are unlikely to ever throw farther. When trying rings, they got to over 200 ft several times. Point being that the rings sometimes provide a way to level the playing field on holes that their skill level peers can reach with golf discs. It turns some holes into fairer technical challenges within a division versus favoring those who have the distance advantage but "equal" skills otherwise.

Note your own decline in distance typically starts around age 40. You have more total playing years ahead than you've likely played already. Considering I've played 33 years competitively, had I started at age 20, I would have already more than doubled my years playing after age 36 than before. Maybe rings should officially be allowed once players reach age 40?
 

Latest posts

Top