biscoe
* Ace Member *
California's laws are unique.
Not completely- this type of discrimination is illegal lots of places.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
California's laws are unique.
California's laws may be unique, but the judges ruling is pretty universally applicable.
Not completely- this type of discrimination is illegal lots of places.
What are the chances DGN shows any Natalie shots at all? 1st card seldom if ever gets any footage.
Arguing Steve Dodge lives in Virginia since his brother does.
What a weak pathetic argument by Jeff Spring and the DGPT.
If she makes it on the lead card, you'll see her in a later round. Based on past performance, the chances of that happening are not bad.
Ah c'mon... his ex-wife and kids live here too...
Dodge probably still has a minority stake in the thing, I'm guessing.I thought Rainwater bought him out.
I won't speculate that they actually would do that, since it would be the most petty thing I can think of in this situation. Obviously they could; just cut her out of the coverage, don't mention the situation all weekend and pretend she doesn't exist. That would just be so weird to do, though.Not necessarily...DGPT was already petty enough to renege on Nova's(right?) win to qualify her for one of their events and awarded the spot to 2nd place.
They aren't required by law to show anything they don't want to - at their event, yes - on their network, nope.
Not necessarily...DGPT was already petty enough to renege on Nova's(right?) win to qualify her for one of their events and awarded the spot to 2nd place.
They aren't required by law to show anything they don't want to - at their event, yes - on their network, nope.
I won't speculate that they actually would do that, since it would be the most petty thing I can think of in this situation. Obviously they could; just cut her out of the coverage, don't mention the situation all weekend and pretend she doesn't exist. That would just be so weird to do, though.
At any rate, if she is in contention we will find out. She hasn't been on tour so hasn't been able to throw with the top female players, and there has to be just enormous pressure on her. Also it appears that a big portion of the FPO crowd has no problem stating that they don't want her there, so her interactions with her competitors will be strained. She will have a lot to block out to throw well this weekend.
I would expect business as usual. They will cover it as always. What would be a surprise is if they discussed the situation at all--which they won't.
If Natalie is in contention, they will just cover her like always. I cannot fathom how they would avoid covering her play in that case.
She's not eligible to play in that event. She knew that before she entered the qualifier. There was no renegging involved.
Does the TRO only apply to CA tournaments?
No Youtube comments today. . .