There are actually two groups, and for the purposes of this discussion, one doesn't matter. There are those who are interested in tournament play, and those who are not. Yes you can put the two groups together as having a commonality, disc golf, but for the purposes of this discussion, they are very disparate.
The crux of my argument was that you can use those posting here as a good sample. Remember, you're talking about posters nation wide, indeed, world wide, who come to this site, and comment. You're comparing that to a handful of people you've talked to. IMO, one represents a significant sample, the other doesn't. To make sure, in my life as a scientist, I took two years of solid statistics and used it day to day to analyze data.
I stand my argument, statistically speaking, as a representation of those who play tournaments, this group is significant. More so than those you've "talked" to. I might even argue it is a good representation of those who aren't interested in large scale tournament play, but I'm less confident there. I see them post here, frequently enough, but not at a high enough level that I'd trust any observation they might make concerning this topic.
You seem determined to find a positive for this event. I don't know either Salient, or this event. That is, I don't have an axe to grind. If you look early in this thread you will see I even said we should take it seriously. However, I do know numbers, and how big events fill. This event isn't hitting on all cylinders for either of those measures. That registers with me.