No, you don't, not really.
He did review Steady Ed, but has not reviewed the other two, now I need to see what courses we share in commont hat he has ranked higher than Steady Ed at 1 disc.
Tom Triplett 2 discs . . . . I gave that one 4 discs
Steady Ed 1 disc . . . . I gave it 4.5 discs
Elon Angry beaver ZERO . . . . I gave it 3.5 Let us see how this course is received after the 2012 Worlds
Kilborne 3 discs but says its too easy . . . . I gave it 4
Rennaisance 2 discs . . . . I gave it 5
Rosewood Dekalb 3 discs says it is not too bad . . . . I gave it 4
Lake Olmstead 4.5 discs . . . . I gave it 3
JP Moseley 4 discs . . . . HEY WE AGREE I ALSO GAVE IT 4 DISCS
He hasn't reviewed a bunch of courses he has played and I am wondering he only reviews when he feels a course is way out of line, whether he truly feels these course are as low as he rates them or if he is just trying to skew the overall averages.
He has his right to an opinion no doubt, I just think he looks at courses very differently than many many others, but I cannot figure out what it is that he values for his ratings. A course that isn't really "easy" Kilborne he says is too easy, but then he knocks down some other tough ones for being ridiculously too hard. He even gives Flyboy a 5 and saying it is exactly what disc golf should be like and how designer should pay attention. I wish I could have gone to Flyboy but alas maybe some other time. He would probably call the masses who he disagrees with sheeple for groupthink. Either he is right we all just follow each other, or he . . . . . . Well just look at his thumbs up or down . . . 91 people think his reviews were helpful and 404 do not.