Thanks for the feedback. I suppose that does seem pretty unintelligent of me when you look at it from that perspective.
I play from the longs on every single course I review so there is a consistent standard. There are very very very few courses that have longs that put most holes in the boring tweener range for me that also have shorter tee pads appropriate for me to have exciting birdies on many holes - most short tee pads are too short for me to provide a fun challenge.
On top of that (and more importantly), there is such a huge amount of variations in scenarios between basket and tee combinations that if you really think about it, there is no other way to consistently rate the playing experience of a course.
Let me help you "wrap your head around" my approach to reviews: think of movie reviews or restaurant reviews. They are critiques by the individual consumer where they express their reaction to the enjoyment they experienced.
What you seem to be after is a PREview.....a write-up to tell you exactly what to expect. That can be found much more quickly from the data on the front page of each course, the pictures and the maps. No need to slog through tons of reviews for that info.
And my ratings, no matter how foolish they seem, never have more than a tiny tiny impact on the overall rating of a course.
Maybe you suffer from not knowing what set of tees to play because so many courses aren't consistent, and most have no thought of the PDGA developed colored based skill ratings.
WTF are black or orange tees??
So when you step onto a course and see two sets of tees, I take it you just shoot for the ones at the back. This would seem obvious to most, but I know Dave likes BLUE tees. Sometimes Blue tees are the third tee in a Red, White, Blue arrangement. But when you have stuff like orange, red, black - a player who goes by consistency and some logic/rule behind the tee design may find himself playing above or below his skill level which in turn can lead to a frustrating or lackluster round.