- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 4,072
So with you having a player rating of 926, a good number by many standards are only yielding a birdie less than 5% of the time at Oak Meadows versus over 11% at the LINKS. Seems like a tougher course.
Plus, your par rate is better at the LINKS as well. It just seems to me when I think Gimmie - I think should be a birdie, but never worse than a par. If my theory is true than Oak Meadows holds strong on not yielding easy holes to birdie, but your point holds water that playing conservatively may yield more pars than I give it credit for.
However, having said that - you still average half a stroke worse at Oak Meadows.
I'm not arguing that The LINKS (blue tees) is a harder course than Oak Meadows. Look at my list; I have Oak Meadows listed three slots above LINKS Blue.
And if you want to compare my scoring statistics (LINKS Blue attached) that's even more misleading because a fair number of those LINKS rounds were thrown well before I got to my current skill level. The Oak Meadow rounds as a whole are closer to where I am now.
Your percentages are right on for my scoring as a whole. (See second attachment.) But now you're veering into the realm of home course advantage... I've got almost 10x the number of holes played and discs thrown on the LINKS as I do at Oak Meadows. I know the lines at the LINKS and can tell you right now what disc I'd throw on every hole. Give me that many rounds played at Oak Meadows and I bet I could come pretty darn close to evening out those Bird/Par/Bogey percentages between the two courses. I mean I do throw primarily RHBH after all.
I agree that Oak Meadows has a fair number of hard-to-birdie/2 holes, and those holes can easily turn into Bogey/4 results when trying for the 2... but it also has a fair number of easy-to-Par/3 holes if that's your goal... but where's the fun in that