etdefender19
Eagle Member
I love reading the threads from people who throw 500' trying to squeeze out extra distance and it leads me to a query of you more experienced players...
Without getting into form critique, or bag composition, or any other third thing, my question is this: how much effort (and practice time) do I really need to spend squeezing every last bit of distance out of the long-distance portion of my game?
My game at this point:
I'm 50, athletic, and in pretty good shape (notable exceptions to follow). I began playing disc golf in December. I play 50-60 baseball games a year (and have for over a decade), so I naturally took to RHFH more easily when I began playing disc golf. Ongoing shoulder (torn rotator cuff) and elbow (tendonitis) issues from baseball (I'm a pitcher) make the FHs I really crank on somewhat painful at times, particularly after a long practice session or round. As a result, I am incorporating more and more BH shots into my arsenal.
Over-simplified summary of where I'm at now: 200' or less: I backhand PnA discs. 200'-250': I backhand PnA's or mids, depending on the circumstance. 250'-300': I forehand a variety of speed 7-9 discs (depending on the shot). Longer than that, I go to my distance drivers (forehand) - which average about 310' - and occasionally I'll get them to 330-350'. I also have a shot I call a "hero roller" where I intentionally turn over a Colussus forehand - if thrown well, and with enough room to work, it will hit the ground about 200' out and roll another 200' (I was basket-high on a 400' hole two days ago). I'm usually only a handful of strokes over par at most courses at the end of the day.
Further detail into my question: I was throwing my DDs 20-30' farther a month or so ago, but with less accuracy. I'm very comfortable with my level of accuracy now, but would love my older, extra, distance back too (and even more). On the other hand, I feel it may not be worth my practice time to work on my drives as much (because of the pain/soreness when I throw too many fully-cranked shots) so I think I'd probably be better off focusing my practice time on the 300' and in shots.
Do I REALLY NEED more distance than I currently have? If I never throw a disc 350' again, would that be the end of the world? To use a ball golf analogy, couldn't I be successful being a relatively short-hitting Zach Johnson with a deadly short game (assuming I could ever develop one) instead of trying to be a long-bombing Dustin Johnson?
Without getting into form critique, or bag composition, or any other third thing, my question is this: how much effort (and practice time) do I really need to spend squeezing every last bit of distance out of the long-distance portion of my game?
My game at this point:
I'm 50, athletic, and in pretty good shape (notable exceptions to follow). I began playing disc golf in December. I play 50-60 baseball games a year (and have for over a decade), so I naturally took to RHFH more easily when I began playing disc golf. Ongoing shoulder (torn rotator cuff) and elbow (tendonitis) issues from baseball (I'm a pitcher) make the FHs I really crank on somewhat painful at times, particularly after a long practice session or round. As a result, I am incorporating more and more BH shots into my arsenal.
Over-simplified summary of where I'm at now: 200' or less: I backhand PnA discs. 200'-250': I backhand PnA's or mids, depending on the circumstance. 250'-300': I forehand a variety of speed 7-9 discs (depending on the shot). Longer than that, I go to my distance drivers (forehand) - which average about 310' - and occasionally I'll get them to 330-350'. I also have a shot I call a "hero roller" where I intentionally turn over a Colussus forehand - if thrown well, and with enough room to work, it will hit the ground about 200' out and roll another 200' (I was basket-high on a 400' hole two days ago). I'm usually only a handful of strokes over par at most courses at the end of the day.
Further detail into my question: I was throwing my DDs 20-30' farther a month or so ago, but with less accuracy. I'm very comfortable with my level of accuracy now, but would love my older, extra, distance back too (and even more). On the other hand, I feel it may not be worth my practice time to work on my drives as much (because of the pain/soreness when I throw too many fully-cranked shots) so I think I'd probably be better off focusing my practice time on the 300' and in shots.
Do I REALLY NEED more distance than I currently have? If I never throw a disc 350' again, would that be the end of the world? To use a ball golf analogy, couldn't I be successful being a relatively short-hitting Zach Johnson with a deadly short game (assuming I could ever develop one) instead of trying to be a long-bombing Dustin Johnson?