I have adjusted scores in both directions moving some up after playing worse and moving down after playing better
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
..... I admire the fact that they have a cross over, and the rating is unaffected by this. That was the reason I mentioned it! I feel the same way about West Lake, and the issues with Park attendee's. The park attendees are to West Lake, as the Cross over is to Idlewild. In my opinion!
I'm not sure how the whole first timer issue came up, but that is really a moot point. I want to know if anyone went back and changed a review of another course because they thought it Better/worse, after playing a top 5 course.
Go convo Russ, I've enjoyed it ......
West Lake has a lot more issues than just the other park users, but that's for a whole other thread .......
]
Thank you, and this is true. The Park Goers was just the most common one I saw. I won't get into, why they should have vending machines that sell power bars somewhere along the course! By the time I finished West Lake, I was starving! Actually, I was hungry when we passed 18. I thought, "Bah, How long could 6 more holes be?" I thought wrong! 19-24 should not be played on an empty stomach! Oy Vey!
I reviewed many of my courses prior to playing Flip, and already had an idea of what did and didn't constitute a good course in (IMO). By the time I played Flip, it was easy to see what made it a 5 and where previous courses I'd played came close or failed miserably in comparison. Didin't really feel a need to go back and change anything afterwards.
.
Fixed .... even though it may have felt like 9
Those pics of West Lake are deceiving, those throws across the dam are way further than they look. Sure, the pics look sweet and innocent, then you tee up from the longs and re-think it.....
OK I was probably being a bit facetious when I said it has to be perfect to be a 5. There could always be more water, more elevation, more woods, bentgrass fairways, beer girls, or golf carts ...... so no, perfect isn't really that obtainable. I would agree with cydisc that 5 isn't an absolute. When I think of a 5 it has to be a course that has no major design flaws and wows you. I have yet to play a course that doesn't have a design flaw or not missing a key amenity. I think too often people get caught up in the wow factor and are then numb to or choose to ignore the design flaws or missing must have amenities.
Let's look at Idlewild. There are 5 disc ratings that list these cons ....
- You have to cross a fairway to get to a tee (major design no no)
- Tricky navigation at times, needs next tee arrows in some spots
- Nothing on the tee sign to signify what pin placement the hole is in
- Overuse of artificial OB at times
- No short tees
- Overly tight for shot shape required at times
These same issues are the only cons the people that rated the course 4.5 listed as well, however they signified this in their rating. These people, like me, see that if there is a design con or flaw it should be noted in the rating ....... shouldn't we all????
Nothing on the tee sign to signify what pin placement the hole is in.....
Not sure what to do here, I tried putting a magnet on the pin position on the sign but that didn't last long. Any Ideas would be helpful.