THUGNIFICENT763
Banned
theyre in the same category on numerous flight charts too... lol
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
it's 0 hss 3 lsf... starfire is 0 hss 3.5 lsf... similar speed/glide ratings...
lat 64's ratings system is flawed...
Lat64 rates the Striker as a 9/5/-1/2...
It has quite a bit more turn and less fade than a Starfire in my experience.
numbers (especially lat 64's...) lie.
You're the one that was using the numbers to justify the assertion that a Striker should be like a Starfire...
numbers from a 3rd party chart (joe's flight), not the manufacturer's... rofl
i called the opto striker a "worse starfire"... and it was.
I guess another Lat 64 disappointment for me was the GL Flow - I field tested it along with a selection of other discs with similar flight numbers, and it came up short, every throw. I'll try it again before I give up on it, but for something described as a "longer River," um, no.
Tweener for sure. Don't think anyone would seriously putt with the harp, also it was no more OS than a suspect for me. The suspects shallow rim felt so much better to me, plus the plastic selection. (I've always been a breaker fan though, so the similarity to suspect is obvious) now the sinus, is another story, that's OS.
Also, I don't understand comparisons between harps a slower roc and a pures a slower buzzz??