- Joined
- Jan 4, 2009
- Messages
- 3,465
It's quite obvious a disc on top of the basket did not go into the basket as is the required flight of path, however a wedgie is not as clearcut because it could come hopping in from the bottom and wedge into the basket from underneath . . . was that the intended flight path to hole out . . . no way, if you think anyone would try that they are crazy.
In myopinion, anything stuck in the chains or restingin or on the edge of the basket should count, anything on top or stuck in the side of bottom should not. The intent should be to clear the basket, hit the chains and fall either into the basket or stay resting in the chains, that is the most obvious way to hole out, so anything else shouldnt count. The problem with allowing wedgies is that you might throw one from 300 feet and wedge it into the basket, but how are you to know the exact flight it took to wedge in the basket? You can't and that is probably why they allow them to rule out any subjectivity by opposing players.
In myopinion, anything stuck in the chains or restingin or on the edge of the basket should count, anything on top or stuck in the side of bottom should not. The intent should be to clear the basket, hit the chains and fall either into the basket or stay resting in the chains, that is the most obvious way to hole out, so anything else shouldnt count. The problem with allowing wedgies is that you might throw one from 300 feet and wedge it into the basket, but how are you to know the exact flight it took to wedge in the basket? You can't and that is probably why they allow them to rule out any subjectivity by opposing players.