The X-Game analogy is often tossed in, but it strikes me as a poor one.
Some of these activities draw participants, seemingly all young men, due in part to the excitement and adrenaline rush. These provide a base audience. We might draw the same players, but certainly not for the same reasons.
These draw outside spectators, in part to watch daredevils doing things the spectators wouldn't dare try---or would no longer dare try. Hard to see disc golf having the same appeal.
Sure, there's a lot more to it than that---but the fact that X-games draw spectators, in spite of, or even because of, their dress and consumption habits, seems to me to have no bearing on whether disc golf might draw large number of spectators, regardless of our image.
Some of these activities draw participants, seemingly all young men, due in part to the excitement and adrenaline rush. These provide a base audience. We might draw the same players, but certainly not for the same reasons.
These draw outside spectators, in part to watch daredevils doing things the spectators wouldn't dare try---or would no longer dare try. Hard to see disc golf having the same appeal.
Sure, there's a lot more to it than that---but the fact that X-games draw spectators, in spite of, or even because of, their dress and consumption habits, seems to me to have no bearing on whether disc golf might draw large number of spectators, regardless of our image.