KniceZ
Double Eagle Member
This thread confirms that DG hasn't settled on a common understanding of par. Is it the pro score, the score for the skill level the course was designed for, the average of everybody that submits scores?
I like having a standard when I go to other courses but generally I'm disappointed that it's too easy. Using different standards (Gold, Blue, etc) is confusing and complicates course comparison.
I've not played enough tournaments to have a solid rating but I'd consider myself in the 850-maybe 900 range. Personally I don't think I should be getting par. Not everyone should get a trophy.
Until we get a standard definition we might as well not have "par".
I like having a standard when I go to other courses but generally I'm disappointed that it's too easy. Using different standards (Gold, Blue, etc) is confusing and complicates course comparison.
I've not played enough tournaments to have a solid rating but I'd consider myself in the 850-maybe 900 range. Personally I don't think I should be getting par. Not everyone should get a trophy.
Until we get a standard definition we might as well not have "par".