SD86
Banned
I don't remember that ever happening. What game was that?
It was years ago. The San Diego Chargers was one of the teams.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I don't remember that ever happening. What game was that?
Hole #3 is an example of a good par 2.
There is NEVER a "good" Par 2, and no tournament hole should EVER be Par 2, unless your intent is to destroy professional disc golf as a serious professional sport.
I think it's a worse look to have someone go -80 during a tournament than to have a par 2. Just my 2 cents though. It's irrelevant if the courses are designed to not have super easy "par 3" holes.
It was years ago. The San Diego Chargers was one of the teams.
**Puts pitchfork down** Thanks for all the great info as always Steve. I think given the format of this event, it's hard to draw conclusions on how well a hole plays. The discrimination factor on how a hole plays is greatly varied by the scenario each player was facing at the time. As it became clear to a player that they had no chance of making the cut, they inevitably took scores they normally would not have if purely playing for their best round.
**Picks pitchfork back up** Hole 3 is NOT an "example of a good par 2" because I refuse to accept that any hole should be a par 2, much less a hole on a championship style course.
I should have said...
I "birdied" it from the short tee in R2 for the only ace on the A-tier side - worth $505!HOFC Round 1 - BigSexy commentary, talking about what to call the 200'-ish par 3 that was obviously a Par 2. The feature card goes 4/4 deuces. They can't bring themselves to say "Nice birdie". Their choice? "Good 2 buddy". "Hey Greg? Nice 2 my man".
As for the second paragraph, you would be justified in picking a burning torch with your other hand. I apologize for uttering the phrase that will single-handedly eradicate all disc golf as we know it from the face of the Earth. I try to refrain from such inflammatory speech outside of the Par Talk thread. I should have said good must-get hole, or good hole you don't really feel good about getting your par on, or good deuce or die , or good hole where a par feels like a bogey, or good hole where you need to realize your birdie doesn't gain you a throw on the field, or some other euphemism which we all know means [expletive deleted]. Because it's not the existence of holes where the players expect to get a two that is the problem; it's what par we assign to it. There are millions of spectators and billions of dollars of sponsor money out there just waiting for something - anything - that will make disc golf look silly enough to give them an excuse to finally avoid it. Only the par-that-must-not-be-named is powerful enough to drive them away.
Everytime a Pro whines about distractions, they should be required to play a round with my weekend group...
What have you got against your weekend group?
I'm curious, what is the frequency that pros blame someone in the crowd for a missed putt? I've seen a couple but not that many.
I'm just expressing my general impression over my 10 years of playing and watching the Youtube. The blaming the crowd was just an example. My point is that disc golfers seem to be more sensitive to distractions than all other pro athletes I've seen.
"frequency" You are such a data nerd Lyle.