- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
- Messages
- 22,093
I was going to post this in the Can anyone throw 500' thread, but figured this is better to have it's own thread without the clutter in that thread.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I was going to post this in the Can anyone throw 500' thread, but figured this is better to have it's own thread without the clutter in that thread.
He didn't really mention current age, he did sort of. If you are over 50 years old and picking up DG good luck reaching 500 feet, let alone 450 or 400.
The second point is your starting flexibility and strength which sort of corresponds to starting at a young age. If you sat at a desk job for 10 years and are 32 and did little to no strength and flexibility training then again, you're going to need many years just to get up to par in order to make a powerful throw.
I think flexibility is a huge limiter for most people. They simply cannot physically do it.
Interesting video. Not sure it brings anything revolutionary to the table, but I liked watching it.
One thing that he does touch on, that is one of the biggest hurdles in my opinion, is pointing out that learning as an adult can be too analytical. It is paradoxical, because I don't think I could have learned how to have a reasonable throw without all of this analysis and breakdown...but you have to stop thinking at some point and just use your natural, 'free-wheeling' intuition.
I basically scoured every scrap of technical, mechanical advice I could starting out. I got caught up in trying to think about the swing as a flowchart of positions, and it never got me anywhere. I was trying to have 3 or 4 thoughts during a swing, and it was just a mess. Then I started just...doing the thing, without thinking about it, and that is what did it for me. You can't separate the two concepts, because having all of this info is part of what got me there, but I think its important to leave the analysis behind at some point, and its very easy to never do that.
Also lol at the thread link, forgot about that rodeo clown show hahaha.
I still don't know if I could throw 500' either. I am able to throw a consistent 400' stand still with a flipped flat wraith, so maybe? But I also like just being that guy that doesn't ever do a runup and still has a respectable throw lol, we may never know.
Appreciate this. I hope it's not revolutionary - I'd be worried that I said something terribly wrong. More like a message/reminder to n00bs like me who have all the enthusiasm in the world but a lot of learning to do.
My first contact with a version of a "free-wheeling" swing was part of what got me in trouble. It was like being "set free" from all the heady stuff and just starting to enjoy the results. Then I got too ambitious way too quickly (without even noticing it) and paid a fortunately survivable price.
I know very few people who would complain about having a 400' standstill. SMASH.
The second point is your starting flexibility and strength which sort of corresponds to starting at a young age. If you sat at a desk job for 10 years and are 32 and did little to no strength and flexibility training then again, you're going to need many years just to get up to par in order to make a powerful throw.
I think flexibility is a huge limiter for most people. They simply cannot physically do it.
One thing that he does touch on, that is one of the biggest hurdles in my opinion, is pointing out that learning as an adult can be too analytical. It is paradoxical, because I don't think I could have learned how to have a reasonable throw without all of this analysis and breakdown...but you have to stop thinking at some point and just use your natural, 'free-wheeling' intuition.
Appreciate this. I hope it's not revolutionary - I'd be worried that I said something terribly wrong. More like a message/reminder to n00bs like me who have all the enthusiasm in the world but a lot of learning to do.
My first contact with a version of a "free-wheeling" swing was part of what got me in trouble. It was like being "set free" from all the heady stuff and just starting to enjoy the results. Then I got too ambitious way too quickly (without even noticing it) and paid a fortunately survivable price.
I know very few people who would complain about having a 400' standstill. SMASH.
I'm out of the loop on members here lately, didn't even realize you made the video. Good work sir!
I agree with you too, it can't be all free-wheeling, but it can't be all analytical step by step posing either. Probably, what I'm talking about is basically what you talked about in the unlearning phases, or is tangentially related at least.
On the other hand, there are data showing that hopping around and random schedules of reinforcement are more effective in later development once a learning base is there (acknowledging the blocked and random practice vid too)
Still annoying when old habits pop back in when you change something else
Touched on in Bruchanus' video… is rest. I have a tendency to want to spend 30-45m throwing hard like every day. Then I got sick for a week or so and didn't touch a disc. Followed that up with parking one hole I've never been able to land in C1. I couldn't get that far on the low line required. Now I've done it three times in a row. The third time was almost pin high. Us cerebral old dudes can't 'power through' training ligaments and tendons.
Now, when they put the other hole I can't get into C1 back to long position… I'll rest up and give it a whirl.
I'm glad Simon has been taking better care of himself but man I wish I was paying attention in the era when he was throwing like that.
Still interested in the differences in technique vs. other variables (anatomy/myotype etc) in where the top people get their power. Superficially, Simon and Wiggins are shaped very differently. Simon moves more like a dancer and Wiggins more like an MMA fighter. I want a randomized experiment where you can give Lizotte Wiggins' form and vice versa and test the results, but sadly that's a fantasy. We also never will get all of the circumstantial variables controlled unless people are throwing in a well-regulated indoor environment. Will have to hope for more data and modeling over time. Mechanically I'm convinced at this point that there are more similarities than differences in the "fundamental" form at the top level, but the interactions between advanced form and individual differences is interesting.
A lot of it has to do with hitting the key points in the swing.
Different ways to get there also create different results in how the disc flies such as spin or leverage as well.
And I think that is a good analogy on wiggens vs simon.
Simon has insane power, but he always looks so in control of it.
He is an outlier for a disc golfer, and its so fun watching him actually golf now and show off his amazing talent on golfing, not just insane shots.
Do you have a write up or summary of the key points of the swing? I've been trying to get "it" and been reading lots here and watching YouTube, but sometimes stuff seems contradictory or is not simple to understand.
When I watch pros it looks like they're doing something extra with the disc that is hard to explain. Getting that snap that shoots the disc out super fast.
I've had the habit of going back through the old DGR Forums and re-reading almost every popular thread from back then in order to find that elusive Snap. It feels like that is something that is not talked about enough these days. Probably because there was no easy way to teach it. I can do hammer pound drills all day without know how to properly incorporate it into my throw.
I've spent a lot of time refining my form with Sidewinder videos and getting the proper swing/body mechanics, but at the end of the day, without that extra magic that HUB mentions, you'll still hit that plateau. For me, I've spent almost two years trying all sorts of things and still hitting the same distance plateau every time. I'm starting to see that the Simon and Paul throws are what's needed to get to the next level. It's clear to me that whatever they're doing to the disc generates a ton of spin. I don't really know where I'm going with this, but I wish sometimes that someone could revitalize the teaching with the hand and wrist and make it easier to understand or more applicable today. (It seems like the incomplete technique was never really completed) You can watch videos and slo-mo all day and not understand how to do it.