I guess I march to the beat of my own drum. It has always led to great results.
Great results...anything you can quantify?
Previously you were judging your throwing results against the average rather than comparing to the best. You were saying that for someone your age to throw 360' after a few months was a great result compared to the average, and that it shouldn't be measured against someone your age who started around the same time and was already throwing over 400' with a max close to 450'.
What you have said on these forums makes me curious as to what your standards are for what constitutes "great results." For example, for skating is it more like "best skater at the local park" or is it "X Games contender?"
I realize that from a certain perspective it is all relative. For example, if someone is throwing 150' and then progresses to 300', that would be great results relative to their own previous performance. But it wouldn't be great in the sense of objectively elite performance. Like, I could go and deadlift 230kg at 90kg bodyweight, and that would be great in the sense that the average lifter is not lifting anywhere near that. But I wouldn't call myself a great deadlifter when that lift is only about 57% of the best deadlift in that weight class.
You say you can show your progress. Is it some quantifiable objective data, like measured throws or an increase in recorded velocity?