What a bizarre comment. A Meteor is basically a well seasoned Buzzz, so if a Buzzz is touchy, a Meteor would be pretty flippy.
Yeah, agree it's a bizarre comment so I'll add some context.
So the Buzzz has almost exactly the same dimensions as the Meteor, but the difference to me is thatthe Meteor has slightly more even ratio of rim depth to width, making it feel much more like a driver in my hand. And just the overall feel of the rim on the Meteor is more sleek, even if the PDGA numbers on the mold don't explain it all.
I'm throwing an older Meteor, I think, fwiw. Like this.
Other context: to me it feels like if the rim doesn't get really snuggly with the crook of my hand, there's this tendency to induce angle errors on harder throws. Buzzz has just enough of a bottom of rim bite and overall shape to keep it from being as snuggly as a Meteor.
Ok, final thing--I wouldn't throw the Meteor as hard as I'd expect to throw a Buzzz on FH--it would flip. So it's more along the lines of 'what does this disc excel at?' and Meteor has this ability to do some Buzzz-like things (amazing inertia, predictable, doesn't fail hard, surprising distance) so I'd throw it in those situations but not when I need to really send it on a FH.
Both discs have strong limitations in my book--Meteor is too understable to rely upon on a max FH, Buzzz is too ungainly and also slightly too understable for a max FH. On a max FH I'd rather throw a Buzzz if OB is an issue, but if I won't be punished too hard, I might throw Meteor and just try to nail the angle control on the hyzer flip.
Sorry, got a bit wordy there. Overall, both are compromised discs on full-send FH shots for me, but with Buzzz it's an issue of comfort and with Meteor it's an issue of angle control.
Edit: I'd still be happy with either one as a 'swiss-army' disc like the OP requested. They are imperfect tho.
PSS - I throw in Denver, so factor in the altitude in my comment.