• Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
    It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)

[Discraft] Buzzz SS or Comet (please read the qualification first)

Blobfish

Double Eagle Member
Bronze level trusted reviewer
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
1,338
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Ok, so I am working with some kids who are eager to start playing disc golf. I have a basket in my classroom and we made an indoor putting league. I have lots of practice putters.
That said, we were going to order some discs for the spring. I had previously purchased a bunch of Z-Buzzzes and since we still have several of those, the kids will likely start off with putter/buzzz combo.

My question to the DGCR audience is, if the kids are already sort of used to the feel of the buzzz, would it make more sense to buy some Buzzz SS's which should feel very similar in hand and should be able to help kids recognize the stability difference between it and a regular buzzz or does that not matter and I should go with some comets, which I know are popular Discraft US mids?

If possible, please justify your reasoning, thanks!

(the students are high school age)
 
Last edited:
The Comet is an incredible flier and is a staple in my bag personally (so take this with a grain of salt.) I think it was a big part of helping me get my form down and really start progressing my game. It has this slow putter like flight but just keeps going, it's also got silly glide.

BUT.

It also has a VERY weird feel, which took me a while to get used to, and it can take a little while to master. Z's and ESP's are a good bit less finnicky, than their X counterparts, but may overlap a touch with the Buzzz as well right out of the box.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
So, is the idea to have a buzz and then paired a more understable complement? Or are you just buying more midranges so that all kids have something?

If the former I'd go X buzzz or X comet (think either fine) rather than SS personally. BTW SS can be pretty stable for beginners, even for athletes IME
 
So, is the idea to have a buzz and then paired a more understable complement? Or are you just buying more midranges so that all kids have something?

If the former I'd go X buzzz or X comet (think either fine) rather than SS personally. BTW SS can be pretty stable for beginners, even for athletes IME


On one hand, I was hoping to let them experience the difference in flight characteristics (they are in my physics class).

On the other hand, I wasn't sure if that would actually be demonstrable to beginners and so therefore, would a comet be a wiser choice? I kind of thought of the comet as a standalone disc that works for all skill levels but caters to lower arm speeds learning to throw, whereas I think of the buzzz ss as a disc specific to buzzz throwers who wanted something that felt like a beat-in buzzz?
 
The Buzzz SS should feel good to them if they like a Buzzz already.
 
I'd go X-Comet.

It gives options in feel. Just as many don't like the feel of the Comet, there are a lot of people who don't like the feel of a Buzzz.
The Comet adds a different feel and flight. A Buzzz-SS isn't going to be that much different to newer players than a Buzzz.
 
I'd go X-Comet.

It gives options in feel. Just as many don't like the feel of the Comet, there are a lot of people who don't like the feel of a Buzzz.
The Comet adds a different feel and flight. A Buzzz-SS isn't going to be that much different to newer players than a Buzzz.

So this was my first thought. I know that there's a lot of comet-love out there and as much as I personally love the sol, I figured the comet might be a better choice. But then I remembered that Discraft makes the Buzzz SS, and hence this post, and my concern that new players really wouldn't see any difference between the SS and the regular buzzz. I have a beat X-buzzz which flies very differently than a Z-buzzz, but I would imagine that if I gave both to a new player, they'd get pretty similar results throwing each.
 
It's a tough call, I think either is suitable. If you already have some Buzzz's get some Comets. People like options. If you are doing more one disc stuff the Buzzz or SS feels more like a putter to me, I used one for years.

The Comet though in terms of physics is superior and will demonstrate the concepts of flight much easier. Of course with two discs the differences in a more stable flight will be more apparent.

There's a great rant by LoPan on disc physics.
 
From Noob questions or ask a stupid question thread: post 402

Neither am I. I do however have a degree that involved a lot of fluid dynamics. And before you ask the question, air is a fluid. And ArcheType, you're sort of right. I'll try to make this as understandable as I can....but this will get REAL sciencey, so bear with me please, or feel free to just skip this post entirely. Or better yet, go hit the end. After finishing up, I realized the first couple paragraphs aren't directly about "Why do I get more glide as it beats in"

Since we're talking about glide here, we'll treat the disc, as a whole, like a wing, or airfoil, as seen here.
IMG00007.GIF

Okay. When the disc flies through the air, you get a distinct seperation of air flow. Now consider two particles that get split up be the disc, one goes on top, one goes on the bottom. They will meet up again, behind the disc, so, because the top one has to travel farther, it is going faster. As speed increases, pressure decreases. You are left with a lower pressure area above the disc, and a higher pressure area below the disc. This phenomenon is called "LIFT" and for a given speed, will overcome the weight of the disc, and push it up. And what about that empty space under the disc? Well in that space, you get all sorts of forces, and I'm not totally sure what the net effect is...so...I'm not even gonna try.
When you now consider the rotation, think about relative speeds. For a RHBH, the left edge of the disc is moving faster than the right edge. So, due to the higher speed, the left edge will create MORE LIFT than the right side. This is shown in Fig. A below. The blue line is the amount of lift exterted on the disc. This is where you get the effect of flip, or HSS. The cant of the the disc then causes the overall lift force to steer the disc to the right.
untitled.jpg

AH! So why don't all my discs keep going right?
Well...you've got a rotating mass. This causes gyroscopic forces having to do with angular momentum and pitch and roll and whatnot. In a nutshell, the rotating mass of the disc causes a sum of forces call gyroscopic procession. This is what causes LSS, same as HSS, just the opposite direction. Fig. B shows the this force on the disc.
When you first release the disc, it has the most spin it ever will in that flight, and the assymetrical lift forces will outweigh precessional roll. But as the disc slows down, the lift forces aren't as large, and the disc rolls to the left.

It slows down, because of DRAG! Drag is a force that opposes your disc. The friction between the disc and air rob energy and the spin reduces, and the forward speed declines! BTW, a driver has less drag than a putter, due to putters having a blunt edge. So a driver's flight is therefore less lift-driven, and more ballistic. But don't think about that for now.

NOW, those of you still reading (god-bless you) are asking, "Okay, neat...what's this s#$t have to do with beating in and more glide?"
Well, turbulence is our friend here. A turbulent boundary layer on the surfaces of the disc eventually result in less drag! There's more fluid dynamics involved here, but trust me when I say, you end up with less drag. This is why golf balls are dimpled, but the reasons are a bit different for a sphere.
So, as you beat in a disc, it gets all these micro abrasions, that cause little eddies and vortexes that add up to turbulent, chaotic flow. In some cases, while this turbulence increases surface friction drag, the overall effect is a reduction in drag forces. This has to do with boundary layers, seperation points, and changes in pressure fields. But I'm damned tired.
The beating in reduces drag (to a point, then you start to get screwed again) allowing a disc to maintain the various lift forces for longer, lettings it go longer before fading, letting it glide longer.
Yeah. I think. Good Night.
 
I'd go with the Buzzz SS. Will grip the same as a Buzzz, and demonstrate an understable flight without adding an additional variable. Maybe even toss a few Buzzz OS's in the cart just to demonstrate the full spectrum.
 

Attachments

  • buzzz.jpg
    buzzz.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 16
Do you need to buy more mids? If I knew a beginner that already had a buzzz and a putter, I would probably recommend a Sting for the next disc (assuming you want to stick with Discraft). I've thrown the ace race Sting and I thought it flew like a beat in Leopard, which is perfect for a beginner driver.
 
are they even gettin the buzzes up to speed to where they would notice the differences
This.

The Buzzz and Buzzz SS are essentially the same disc for low-power throwers. There isn't enough difference in them that players with minimal skill will see much (if any) change. Meteors are the same way, you have to know how to throw to get it to have the understable flight it is supposed to have. Comets fly OK ish at low power so they might work better. Or not, it's hard to know. You would have to go with the Sol to have something that would be really noticeably different for low power/low skill players.

If the kids are actually throwing the Buzzz pretty well, you can throw out everything I typed.
 
I bag Comets and a regular Buzzz, I've thrown an SS Buzzz a few times.

For me the Comet always feels power hungry, not being a disc that really like being thrown at lower speeds, might just be me but all the Comets I've owned (X, Z, ESP, gloZ, gloESP) were the same in that characteristic, they wanted power.

I've had quite a few Buzzzs over the years from the original bar stamp to TI (haven't thrown the new swirlies or PMcB) and none of them had the power hungry feeling I get from a Comet, they all seemed to be fine powered down, different flights of course but not incapacitated like a low powered Comet.

If picking between the 2 for starting players I'd say the Buzzz SS.

Someone here also mentioned the Sol, if you aren't set on either the Comet or Buzzz SS then it may be worth a look as to me they fly like a non power hungry Comet.
 
I agree with those saying find something less stable than either a buzzz ss or a comet to demonstrate understability in comparison to a buzzz for beginners. I'm an intermediate player and bought a new Z comet recently that would not turn until months of playing with it. The feel was something I hated as a beginner but forced myself to get used to once I realized how useful it was on the course.

I learned the hyzer flip and turnover with a Discraft Archer, which had a comfortable rim and was my longest flying disc for a long time. I pass this thing to every friend I introduce to the sport and they always gravitate toward it. I don't know how available they are but I don't hesitate in recommending them as a learning tool/max distance driver for students.
 
Top