*disclaimer* I think they BOTH should have been in / still be in prison. No excuse for animal abuse and no excuse for DUI, period. Actually I think Vick outta be publicly hung. (is that to harsh??) That's what kind of dog lover I am.
But fact of the matter is, if Vick hadn't lied continuously, to everybody who inquired, he'd have probably spent only 24 days in jail too. Furthermore, Stallworth's problems were at the state level, Vick's, federal. That's a huge, HUGE difference. Ya can't lie to federal investigators and get away with it. Look at Bonds or Clemens. Their problems aren't that they took PED's; it's that they LIED about it, to the feds. Can't do that. Hell, Bill Clinton. The issue wasn't that he screwing another woman, it was... again... that he lied about it.
There's also more to Stallworth's sentence than that. He stopped IMMEDIATELY after he hit the fella. The victim darted out in the middle of the road, NOT in or near a cross walk. Stallworth honked and flashed his lights before impact. After, he was EXTREMELY apologetic. (not that it should matter) And finally, the prosecutors just didn't have a very strong case against him. Had he fought the charges, he probably could have gotten it knocked down to like DWVI. He took a deal quickly to get it out of the media spotlight.
Besides, what Vick was doing took years to set up and and a huge "system" that HE was the ringleader of. What happened to Stallworth could happen to anybody. You, me, anybody, whether we're intoxicated or not. It was a sudden, "freak" thing. Vick's took premeditation, over LONG periods of time.
Now I'm not saying one is worse than the other, obviously they're both terrible. But the comparison is apples to oranges on several levels. In a vacuum, yeah, you'd think Stallworth's penalty should have been worse. But this isn't a vacuum; this is the real world, where life's not fair and anybody who says it is, is flat out lying to ya. (hopefully not to the feds)