tom12003
Eagle Member
As a Sr. Grand (>65 yr old), I was able to hit those 250-300' water carries a dozen years ago, but as age ravages almost everyone, I need a reasonable bail out area (I'll take a bogey versus a splash out—bogey plus). I routinely hit (casual rounds) in the low 900+ ratings (good days around 935+; bad days mid 850s).
In designing courses, think about everyone who might play, not just the young guns on the super Gold courses. We all need a level of enjoyment. A month ago, I just missed a 20' birdie putt on #12 on Winthrop Gold (par 5, 901', with the yellow ropes); young guns were after eagles—only in my dreams.
Designers often only think about challenging the young guns but rarely think about their grandfathers. I love a challenge but prefer throwing an accurate 225' drive and challenging for a par. Do not over design. Us old guys are a growing group; do not overtly discourage us; the sport needs the gray beards.
I find the shorter "middle" school-type courses to be lame (ace runs) and enjoy the greater challenges. Designing a 300' mando carry is the opposite.
What's better to see a bunch of gray beards beating a bunch of NO beards!
In designing courses, think about everyone who might play, not just the young guns on the super Gold courses. We all need a level of enjoyment. A month ago, I just missed a 20' birdie putt on #12 on Winthrop Gold (par 5, 901', with the yellow ropes); young guns were after eagles—only in my dreams.
Designers often only think about challenging the young guns but rarely think about their grandfathers. I love a challenge but prefer throwing an accurate 225' drive and challenging for a par. Do not over design. Us old guys are a growing group; do not overtly discourage us; the sport needs the gray beards.
I find the shorter "middle" school-type courses to be lame (ace runs) and enjoy the greater challenges. Designing a 300' mando carry is the opposite.
What's better to see a bunch of gray beards beating a bunch of NO beards!