Marmoset
* Ace Member *
open your mind and go learn something, and stop thinking you have to defend yourself every time you might be wrong.
This is great advice for everyone (including myself)
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
open your mind and go learn something, and stop thinking you have to defend yourself every time you might be wrong.
...but I seen examples of putters....not drivers(which would be far more difficult to determine because there is a little edge to compare the PLH)....
My domey E*Destroyer is a meathook vs a flat, flippy star destroyer. Explain that one.
I used to think that the speed 9 and under discs are usually less stable as they get domier.
10 and up get more stable as the get domier, especially the warp speeders. This is still true in many cases but not true in others.
Now I go by PLH and I have rarely been let down... I have 1 anomaly DX Roc that has a normal height PLH but is a meathook. Apart from that disc my PLH theory has held up in every instance I've seen.
PLH has been the most consistent predictor of stability that I've seen.
Sorry, that is dependant on mold geometry.
I wish I could tell you a rule and have it work correctly every time but I can't.
It is a case by case basis.
I will do some more pondering on your question tonight, though.
It's amazing how often I will pick up a buddies disc...I say"dang this thing is domie...it must be overstable to a flat one"...buddy replies...."yeah...I carry two...one for stability and the other for turn overs"
This happens all the time, as I anticipate using it as a gauge when buying discs...as it works better than trying to eyeball the differences in PLH.
PLH is true(according to the forum discussion)....but I seen examples of putters....not drivers(which would be far more difficult to determine because there is a little edge to compare the PLH)....
Maybe were both right....that is why I use the word generally...as in...."DOES NOT APPLY TO EVERYTHING"
read the PLH thread.
All will be explained.
Generally = most of the time, so common it can be counted on.
When it comes to dome vs. stability, there are no "general" rules. I understand that your personal experience has suggested otherwise, and you do not necessarily trust people on the internet who argue contrary to your personal experience. To tell you where I'm coming from may influence your opinion, maybe not, but here goes...
I've worked in 3 disc golf stores since 2003, eyeing, weighing, and throwing thousands of discs. One of my current sponsors, Clearwater Disc Golf Store, has over 10,000 discs in inventory. Out of all of these, I have found so many discs that betrayed the "domey is more stable" generalization that I would never perpetuate it a rule of thumb when selecting discs. The only use of generalizations is that they help us predict the unknown. If I used the "domey more stable" generalization, I would expect the latest run of star Katanas to be flippy...The Katana is an understable mold, and the production run are flat as pancakes. However, these discs are as overstable as an average Boss (way more than the Katana is designed for), even when thrown 400'+. What good is that generalization if it can fail so miserably in predicting the stability of new discs? However, if you compare the PLH of the new Katanas, you can see that it is much higher than the flippier Pro Katanas, hinting to the extra overstability. This generalization is useful because it holds true in novel examples.
Nice article
This article may clear things up or may lead to more arguing.
https://www.dgcoursereview.com/dgr/resources/articles/discqualities.shtml
For those that havent followed this link, it says pretty much the opposite of what Nate says on dome.
I think I will stick to just looking at PLH
I agree....more dome usually(generally) means more stability...where as a flat disc means...flippy flippy...or less stability.