Courses on private land, if they're open to the public, aren't likely to escape. Private businesses that are open to the public certainly haven't. And they'll likely have a very expansive definition of "open to the public".
Very true however I was thinking more along the line of Flyboy where folks are invited to play. I don't think what you are talking about would apply there. Then again I've never met a ADA lawyer because if I had I would likely be in jail at the moment...
There is a key element in the story that killed this course and it wasn't so much the ADA it was the local muni calling the DOJ asking for a ruling. In my experience you are much better off NOT calling the government asking for a "ruling" than just installing the daggum thing. Had they installed it without contacting anyone exactly no one at the federal level would have cared. And if they did, it would be an easy fight. "You really going to make us tear up all this nature to make it work? What about our hiking trails? Also, this isn't golf." And the fed would walk away
Now that the DOJ has been contacted and an article has been written they are screwed. Time to start rattling the cage of the local congressman...
Now make no mistake, I have no issue with making certain things wheelchair accessible. For example, if you need to go to court and are chair bound you ought to be able to wheel right into the courtroom no problem. And every publicly owned building (among many other things) ought to be that way. But what they are doing goes way way too far like much of the ADA law.
Here's a great ADA story....
MDOT (Michigan Department of Transportation) had a little street improvement project right in front of the Commission for the Blind in Lansing a number of years ago. They installed dimpled sidewalk right by the edge of each intersection. According to legend this is how a phone conversation between MDOT and someone at the commission went:
CFB: Hi, what is that dimply stuff you've installed on the walks?
MDOT: It's for you. It's so a blind person can detect the intersection.
CFB: Well, we don't need it. Tear it out because we hate it.
MDOT: Why?
CFB: We already have ways of training blind folks how to detect the intersection we don't need the dimply thingys.
MDOT: The feds made us do it.
CFB: (Grumbling)
*CLICK*