rusch_bag
* Ace Member *
Trey133 said:riverboy said:Int. is where baggers reside.mzuleger said:rusch_bag said:NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
I was 1 stroke off of my first unofficial 1000 rated round. I shot a 975 and then a 996 for my tournament this past weekend and I left a lot of strokes out there.
I just check the stats for this tourney and apparently I should have played advanced. My 131 would have placed 3rd (1 strok behind Rusch) in advanced but was 12th in int?!?!? Makes no sense at all.
Sooooo true, I feel like the pdga should change some things up with Ratings caps.
I feel like 900 should be the cutoff for advanced. By the time someone is 935 rated, they have the capability to shoot lights out, Pro rated rounds, but just don't do it very consistently yet. Yet, in Int. it only takes one of those rounds usually to win... so the cream of the crop intermediate plays ALWAYS stay at the top.
Sorry to burst your bubble a little bit but we had 2 extra holes in addition to the 2 extra holes you had.
Edit - I also feel that something needs to be done with int and adv. I recently made the switch to adv and I am still placing very highly in adv. The cut off needs to be lower for sure. I have also noticed that at least around here, the int field is normally twice the size of adv and it is annoying to only play against 10-15 people when int has 20-30 and enough of them are just as good as the people in adv.