Couldn't agree with this more. Threw them against the first ones I got and there is a complete night and day difference in them.
You can't really compare PLHs too much between different molds. Different wing shapes cause the different PLHs to act differently. A high PLH on an Amp may cause it to be more stable that a Shock with a low PLH, but is still higher than the Amp's.
So what testers are reporting is that the disc is significantly different. Which is good...
But don't get me wrong, I am not:
- picking on MVP/UPS (I too am an MVP fanboy)
- trying to derail the thread
- open a can of worms
- trolling
At what point do mold tweaks require the need of PDGA re-certification?
Maybe all manufacturers do it to an extent, but come on, what was originally designed and approved is changed to something else. IMO, it makes the PDGA approval process and the whole notion of what's legal and what isn't or shouldn't be legal, complete bunk.
I appreciate that discs fly differently for different peple. But aren't tweaks to a mold a loophole? Shouldn't manufacturers be held to making what was initially approved? Don't send it in for approval until you are ready!!!!
Aside - Who knows what Prodigy's D1-4 line will be in a couple years, they are all approved now but will likely be changed.