- Joined
- Mar 10, 2008
- Messages
- 4,039
This makes no sense to me.
Let's assume it was yellow for the truck and red for Ricky.
Ricky turns right on red, either not seeing or not realizing the truck won't stop. There are 3 options:
1 - If the truck did not have the ability to stop safely (just went yellow), this is then 100% Ricky's fault.
2 - If the truck did have time to stop and didn't - then it is at best shared fault. The truck should have stopped. Ricky should not have gone right on red if he couldn't have safely done so. Really though - even in this case - I'd lay blame on the car going right on red.
3 - Unable to determine the timing and if the truck could have stopped. IMO here I still blame the car going right on red. Clearly there is fault there - and there *may* be fault on the truck going through on yellow.
1- agreed
2- if the truck couldve stopped and is required to stop if they couldve safely, then the truck shouldve never been in the intersection at the same time ricky was turning. in this case ricky wouldve have been legally right to be in the intersection (assuming he came to a stop for 3sec) where as the truck wouldnt have legally been in the intersection.
3- yes i would agree, if they are unable to clearly determine the factors involved then i would have to lay blame on ricky as well on common sense standards.