Congrats on last cash, now you owe us $50!
right?!
Odd scenario that might come up;
last cash is passed on, and nobody after last cash is a member, so they would essentially owe money in order to "cash"
where would these funds go?
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Congrats on last cash, now you owe us $50!
lol what happens when some schmuck cashes for like $50 and doesnt have a membership?
now you have to pay someone $25 for a membership, or take a trophy? and what would happen to the $10 you already paid just to play cuz you werent a member?
Or if an Am cashes for like $20 or something awful, now you choose between a trophy or paying money just for cashing, crazy
right?!
Odd scenario that might come up;
last cash is passed on, and nobody after last cash is a member, so they would essentially owe money in order to "cash"
where would these funds go?
right?!
Odd scenario that might come up;
last cash is passed on, and nobody after last cash is a member, so they would essentially owe money in order to "cash"
where would these funds go?
I would imagine the $10 non-member fee is rolled into the membership payment, so it would be $65 deducted from winnings for a non-member rather than $75. The PDGA has for years made available to TDs a discount code for $10 off membership specifically to give to players who play an event as a non-member and decide to join afterwards. Same principle would apply here.
If a player, am or non-member, doesn't win enough cash to cover a membership (or an upgrade), I'd imagine they simply decline the prize all together. For the am player, last cash (because that's the only likely place where they'll get less than $25) in a pro division probably isn't worth accepting anyway. Just stay am until you cash for enough to cover the fee.
...
If a player, am or non-member, doesn't win enough cash to cover a membership (or an upgrade), I'd imagine they simply decline the prize all together. For the am player, last cash (because that's the only likely place where they'll get less than $25) in a pro division probably isn't worth accepting anyway. Just stay am until you cash for enough to cover the fee.
...
makes sense
I think this whole thing with not being able to take merch in lieu of cash is gonna make a lot of soft open fields, smaller and tougher. Which sucks.
I'm curious. What would the status of of an Am be if they accept $20. Could they continue to play in sanctioned events to get the additional $5 to upgrade?
Consider that they accepted $20, and accepted that they wouldn't receive it.
If im reading your question right. TD would collect the $5.00 from the player then send it in along with the prize money.
Biggest loophole Im not sure of yet is if a pro player is not current and cashes. Can they decline just like an AM. Granted it prob in the rule book and i need to brush up on it again with the new update.
Going to the IDGC TD event in November so im keeping my fingers crossed issues like this will be addressed not trying to go off the book.
Im shocked to not see some of the td's not complaining about the new AM rules on payouts. Extra leg work if they don't spend it day of. I know local club in my area you have to be a member and have your payout stamped if you want to save it. Looks like PDGA is pushing for online vending vs local clubs.
1.10
4. If a TD uses merchandise vouchers for Amateur payout, they must be
redeemable at the event or afterwards via online fulfillment.
5. Any prizes (cash or merchandise) that remain unclaimed (through no fault
of the TD) six months after the completion of the event are then relinquished
by the player. TDs must make a reasonable effort to provide the payout to
the player by contacting them, offering to ship, etc.
I'm curious. What would the status of of an Am be if they accept $20. Could they continue to play in sanctioned events to get the additional $5 to upgrade?
Consider that they accepted $20, and accepted that they wouldn't receive it.
If im reading your question right. TD would collect the $5.00 from the player then send it in along with the prize money.
...
Sorry, I should have been clearer.
The Am does not decline the $20, but refuses to pay the remaining $5.
The TD will not be able to award the Am the $20, since the Am has to pay $25 for a professional membership before he/she can receive any winnings. Hence the Am accepted the winnings, but could not receive them.
The TD, I assume, has to send the $20 to the PDGA and the PDGA would credit the Am with $20 (as is done for a non-member paying $10 to play in a sanctioned event -- the non-member can ask the PDGA to credit all non-member fees that year toward that year's membership fee).
After this, does anyone know what the player's status is after the TD sends the PDGA the $20?
The rule only impacts those that can cash in open but only play a couple of tourneys a year who just pay the $10 fee instead of renewing. (Ie. me)
Edit: as also pointed out, bad for women due to minimal players with greater variance in skill levels
Question;
So as I understand the new payout stuff, if you are an Am with an Am pdga membership, or just a guy with no pdga membership, and you cash, they are going to take either $25 or $75 depending on which situation I described, directly out of your payout and essentially buy or upgrade your membership and status? Is this correct?
That is the way the 2018 comp manual currently reads.
Correct. Or at first glance, that appears to be correct.
This will affect age protected divisions also. I am a masters age amateur who has recently been playing Pro Masters. I have cashed a few times and took merchandise so i wont lose my eligibity for Am Worlds in 2018. Now starting in 2018 i will no longer play Pro Masters because im not playing in a division where i cannot cash without losing my eligibilty. Does that make me a sandbagger?
Does that make me a sandbagger?