BuiltTooLong
Double Eagle Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2014
- Messages
- 1,725
Agree that Cale needs to be mentioned with anything Prodigy even if he doesn't extensively tour. Also, is Uli's move to Discraft as imminent as McBeth's??
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
How can Discraft sign all these players? One would think that already signing PMcB would take all their budget and more.
I would much rather be robbed than raped.:\
1725 posts in and the overall misunderstanding of how big Discraft is still exists.
This is so far off topic that it's not even funny. But if you want to play.
https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/blog/top100dangerous this list is based off FBI statistics.
... I'm not sure what you're trying to prove when all the statistics say the complete opposite. I'll post the stats below so you can do the simple math and see for yourself. As I said, it's best not to throw stones.
...
Now, can we get back to the topic at hand and stop cluttering this chat with other things.
I would much rather be robbed than raped.:\
If we lend some credibility to the rumors found here and on reddit for a moment let's fast forward to February and imagine one of the possible "new look" scenarios!
Notes at the bottom:
Innova's Top 3:
- Barsby
- Sexton
- Conrad
Discraft Top 3:
- McBeth
- Jones
- Ulibarri
Discmania Top 3:
- McMahon
- Lizotte
- Shue
Prodigy Top 3:
- Dickerson
- Paju
- Orum (or Colglazier)
Latitude Top 3:
- Wysocki
- McCray
- Owens
Dynamic Discs Top 3:
- Melton
- Risley
- Oakley (or Keegan)
DGA Top 3:
- Elmore
- Bitney
- Criss
--------------------------
Notes:
- You have to be "full time touring" to be on this (for fun, irrelevant) list. Discraft obviously has MJ and Doss, but we'll likely only see them sporadically unless things change. I'm also counting MPO, so in cases like DGA where Jon Baldwin is the #1 he doesn't make the list because he mostly plays MP40+
- I didn't do FPO to keep the post short, and because there seem to be fewer moves. If someone wants to, feel free.
- If Jones goes with Prodigy over Discraft (seems to be the strongest 2 suitors), he goes immediately to #2 and bumps Paju to #3
- Small rumor that I heard awhile back but nothing new on is Grady Shue being courted by DD (he's dating Bjerkaas). That would move him from Discmania #3 --> DD #1, and bring Nate Perkins into the Discmania #3 spot.
- I omitted Westside and MVP because of their small teams with no real week-in and week-out road warrior NT/M/PT threat. Am I wrong? Agree or Disagree? Matt Dollar might be the biggest threat, but he doesn't tour much.
- Some people might argue that Emerson Keith and Matt Bell deserve to contend for the #3 spot in lieu of Devan Owens. Thoughts?
-------------------------
Or in general, reactions?
- If Jones goes with Prodigy over Discraft (seems to be the strongest 2 suitors), he goes immediately to #2 and bumps Paju to #3
You're forgetting about Cale on the Prodigy side. I think he hits enough big events to fit the full time touring pro stipulation.
Agree that Cale needs to be mentioned with anything Prodigy even if he doesn't extensively tour. Also, is Uli's move to Discraft as imminent as McBeth's??
How can Discraft sign all these players? One would think that already signing PMcB would take all their budget and more.
1725 posts in and the overall misunderstanding of how big Discraft is still exists.
The only things I have a problem with are in bold. No way Jones jumps Paju without major results next year. Paju has major stock and runs most of Prodigy EU and is very crucial to the brand. I doubt they would bump him for a up and coming player who has not really had a major win.
I would still think Melton is more of a draw than Shue. He is more marketable and clearly the better player right now. No way DD would bump Melton even with the Shue-PB romance.
Honestly, Nate perkins is probably the better player VS shue as well. I think he is more marketable right now also. Although that could easily change going forward.
Matt Dollar is a good player for MVP, same with Elaine King. But I have yet to see MVP shell out real dough for a star. I would like to see them step their game up and get a big name if they can afford it.
Also, FWIW I think Owens is clearly the more marketable player vs Kieth and bell. He is also the better player.
I'd still put 1029 rated, 6th at worlds Paju over 1022 rated, 9th at worlds Jones.
I know Jones got a lot of hype because he played USDGC well and was good at the end of the year, but Paju played well at Konopiste and Waco and Worlds and DDGC.
Only thing really holding him back is his putting, and he switched his stroke up toward the end of the season to something that looks more repeatable with less moving parts. I think an offseason of perfecting it will do him a world of good.
The only things I have a problem with are in bold. No way Jones jumps Paju without major results next year. Paju has major stock and runs most of Prodigy EU and is very crucial to the brand. I doubt they would bump him for a up and coming player who has not really had a major win.
I would still think Melton is more of a draw than Shue. He is more marketable and clearly the better player right now. No way DD would bump Melton even with the Shue-PB romance.
Honestly, Nate perkins is probably the better player VS shue as well. I think he is more marketable right now also. Although that could easily change going forward.
Matt Dollar is a good player for MVP, same with Elaine King. But I have yet to see MVP shell out real dough for a star. I would like to see them step their game up and get a big name if they can afford it.
Also, FWIW I think Owens is clearly the more marketable player vs Kieth and bell. He is also the better player.
Honestly, Nate perkins is probably the better player VS shue as well. I think he is more marketable right now also. Although that could easily change going forward.
Jones also nearly won Idlewild, but point well made.
Being crucial to the brand is not what he meant. Schusterick is crucial to the brand, too, but he's clearly not on the list
Just a minor point - this isn't how the sponsors would see their own players, but my idea of how the fans would see the pecking order. So while I respect the Paju's for investing in Prodigy and growing the game, I didn't factor that in here (also why Will isn't on the list, despite his heavy lifting off the course lately - he's clearly the top dog and biggest name in the long veiw).
Shue was top 10 in the Pro Tour and National Tour standings for most of this year, he had a really good 2018, which is why I think he'd slightly edge Melton. Good argument about "draw" though, Melton is the bigger name as of now.
Jones also nearly won Idlewild, but point well made.
Disagree. No knock on Nate but his putting can be a bit inconsistent.
Well, could be worse, could be Philadelphia:
"Philadelphia consistently ranks above the national average in terms of crime, especially violent offenses. It has the highest violent crime rate of the ten American cities with a population greater than 1 million residents, as well as the highest poverty rate among these cities. It has been included in real estate analytics company NeighborhoodScout's "Top 100 Most Dangerous Cities in America" list every year since it has been compiled."
Nate has a higher rating than Shue right now... he's also ranked over 30 spots higher in world rankings so numbers agree with me.
How can Discraft sign all these players? One would think that already signing PMcB would take all their budget and more.
1725 posts in and the overall misunderstanding of how big Discraft is still exists.
I obviously have no knowledge of anything in the flying disc business, but Discraft always struck me as different back in the day. It seems like a legit flying disc company competing against disc golf companies.Until I'm proven wrong (and I very well may be in the future), my read on the whole thing is that they've been in a quasi-tailspin since the 2012 Exodus of the team to Prodigy, supporting the AUDL (founded in 2012), and having the biggest name players that stayed with them tour less and less each year.
I'm sure there are many other factors in there, that's just what can be seen publicly, but the other side of that coin is that they've had lower overhead theoretically and could have been planning a big move and waiting for opportunity.