Frankly I have seen no reason why Salient can not pull off this event. The amount of anti-Salient rhetoric with little to back it up. Sure there have been some that had a bad customer experience but how does that show us their competency to run a tournament?
You have three or four world renown DGer's assisting with the design and the event. That is far more talent and experience than at the Aussie Open but there was little said about that one. As for course design I'd take the proposed course design of Wysocki, Feldberg and Crump any day over Chris Finn's AO design which was essentially a simple wide open huckers course.
Personally I am looking forward to the event. If I was wanting to be critical it would be the lack of coverage for most holes as they are only going to cover 5 holes(?) I believe.
Still it will be a better event than either of the Czech or Estonian events the WDGT is putting on.
They're certainly going to pull something off. They have a venue, film crew, and broadcasting outlet. The event is going to happen.
But if just 20 people show up to play, and a few hundred tune in to watch online, have they really accomplished anything?
They dove into this thing expecting the letters E, S, P, and N would be enough to draw in top level talent and a huge fan base. They were dead wrong.
Their entire focus has been on putting together an event that they feel is most attractive to a broadcast audience, rather than putting that effort into making sure it's an event that's attractive to the players. What they didn't plan for was the fact that no one wants to pay $300 for the chance to be on a webcast buried somewhere deep inside the WatchESPN app.
So yes, Salient is going to pull something off, but is it really going to be what they want?
There are two questions that the event and it's supports should have ready answers to:
- Why should I play this event?
- Why should I watch this event?
If you're going to spin it around and say "Why aren't you going to play?" or "Why aren't you going to watch?" then you've already lost. The onus is not on a consumer to turn down a product, it's on the product to sell to the consumer.