A few thoughts to get back on track.
2. I love that the manufacturers are getting involved and helping out the crews. But they are also holding the entire media back by restricting access to events based on WHO is supporting "rival" crews. I don't think that we are not in a position to turn away free media for our largest events. And if CCDG wants to cover LVC, or Masters Cup, or GBO, or ANY NT of Major at no cost to the event, they should be allowed to. Or IF SmashBoxx wanted to show up on OUR OWN DIME to NTs and Majors, we should be allowed to attend. These are the PDGA's biggest events and restricting media access to them isn't the way we should be approaching this.
I don't agree with this. With the amount of money that manufacturers put into title sponsoring (and running with their own staff these days), they have the right to have exclusivity should they desire it. Our sports biggest events cost 6-figures to execute all in. Manufacturers have rights to ROI on hosting these events, otherwise there will be no future, because the professional tour absolutely depends on the pockets of the biggest companies within the sport to even survive.
Unfortunately, there's not enough money to buy out all of the advertising slots in everybody's coverage, and it's disrespectful to ask you, Ian, et al to work for fractions of pennies, AND kowtow to pros demands of more AND deeper payouts, AND provide spectator experience. You have to draw the line somewhere.
I want you to make money, but if I'm Manufacturer A I do not want to pay for Manufacturer B's advertising slots. Now, if the manufacturers work up a quid pro quo system? That would be an amicable and altruistic move, but they're under no obligation to do anything of the sort.
Views do not grow the game, money grows the game. Views are a means to money.