jrawk
* Ace Member *
will do. we were going to play in the punisher tomorrow but the weather didn't look so hot and missed registration.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I'm following the discussion, and am quite intrigued by what seems to be the accepted fact that, tangential elements of the throw aside, he's nailing the important part, the hit. While the original description attempted to describe this part, I'm still not sure exactly what I should be focusing on...the key elements of the "good" part. The resulting discussion has danced around what NOT to focus on in the video while really only referring to the fact that he's got the hit right...not(at least that I've been able to decipher) what it is that he's doing right and how I can relate that to what I'm seeing in the video.
Would anyone like to take a stab at summarizing the element(s) that I should be focusing on here, and what I should be looking for in the video that demonstrates it?
Hey Techno, that was a good read and interesting to hear about your experiences and how you have improved. I've certainly nothing against improving and hopefully I underestimate myself and my abilities. I just still have a problem with the whole notion of this big 'secret' and that if I somehow manage to figure it all out, I will throwing these big distances. I doubt that it's that simple. I think I basically get what people are talking about when they say things like 'feeling the hit' and 'pound the hammer.' As I understand it, the big things are to get your complete weight centered over your plant leg as you begin the pull,achieve maximum shoulder rotation at this same point, and then uncoil starting with your core and let all the pent up energy whip the shoulders and arm around. I get all that and know what a good rip feels like. It's just even with all that, I'm just not going to be a 400 or even 350' thrower probably. But I'm totally cool with that! Frankly, I'll just be happy when my backhand catches up with my forehand in distance. I practice backhand way more than forehand, yet it will still come up a good 50' short or more driving off the same teepad. That part is frustrating! If I can get to the point where I'm about equally confident in either shot, I'd be pretty happy.
It seems like a distance line to me. What other type of throw goes ~45' high and tracks left-to-right for the majority of its flight when thrown hyzer rhbh? Golf lines generally have a lower ceiling and more defined direction, but you wouldn't be breaking 400' with a putter on a low straight line.
Dodge, seems your concern is Physical size versus technique. If i follow, you don't believe you can achieve long distance without size and strength. One or many examples: Nikko Lacastro is a tiny dude and can huck 450 footers accurately with ease. It's all about technique, perfect practice, patients, and more patients. This is the way golf is: Easy to learn, hard to master. I didn't think i could hit 400, but i have a handful of times. As soon as that 400 ft disc leaves your hand, you know it, because everything felt like it clicked.
first - notice how my hand is in line with my elbow from my shoulder, everything from your index finger all the way to your shoulder should be in a straight line... a lot of players tend to get their elbow low, and kind of whip there hand around their lower body... your hand should be higher than your shoulder in the follow through, the people who "strong arm" and do early releases all have a follow through, where their hand is below their shoulder on the follow though.
2nd - notice the angle of my feet, in relation to where i am aiming. i am aiming about where that little white sign is you can see in the distance, my feet are aligned up way to the left of that, because if you want to get full extension in your throw, your feet will be setup like this, if you kind of follow tee pads and throw in line with the teepad, you are automatically going to force yourself to either release early, or pull with your arm low, or "grip lock" and throw way right..
3rd - i want you to notice my weight is always center to myself, meaning i am not leaning forward or backward, until the moment of the snap, then my weight goes forward, not forward in the direction of the disc, but forward in the direction of my run up, which is very important, otherwise you will find yourself leaning backwards when you throw, and that will make you throw nose up and various other things.
Dodge, seems your concern is Physical size versus technique. If i follow, you don't believe you can achieve long distance without size and strength. One or many examples: Nikko Lacastro is a tiny dude and can huck 450 footers accurately with ease. It's all about technique, perfect practice, patients, and more patients. This is the way golf is: Easy to learn, hard to master. I didn't think i could hit 400, but i have a handful of times. As soon as that 400 ft disc leaves your hand, you know it, because everything felt like it clicked.
Spot on, right there. Once you get to the point where you can consistently feel everything "click", you begin to realize it actually takes very little power to produce a 400' drive. Garb is totally right that the very last second before release is the most crucial in finding where it all "clicks". Personally, I was able to find it on my own in a similar fashion to Kachtz. I never read anything or did any drills. I just watched a few people do it, then replicated. I figured it was easy as that until I started trying to show others.
1. "keep your arm straight, pull across your chest"
Threads like this are helpful, but it's not helpful to say "anybody can learn to throw for the distance Katzch is getting." That's like saying "Anybody can learn to throw a 90mph fastball." Or "anybody can learn to hit a golf ball 300 yards." I'm not saying there's anyone who can't benefit from learning the right technique, or "the hit" or "the secret" or whatever, but the ultimate results are going to differ for everyone because our raw physical abilities are all different. Sure, throwing a disc is not about strength and power, but neither is pitching baseballs or hitting golf balls. I actually think it's more about having long arms, flexible limbs, elastic sinews, and fast-twitch muscles, and this seems to be more common in ectomorphs than in mesomorphs or endomorphs. Just because you discovered "the secret" doesn't mean you're going to throw putters 400' any more than me learning perfect pitching technique is going to have me throwing 90mph. You can train any horse to run faster, but a Clydesdale is never going to win the Belmont. All I'm saying is that setting unrealistic raw distance goals for people who don't have the right kind of athletic talent is going to lead to as much frustration as anything.
Golf and baseball are two different things. I would say that anyone can LEARN to throw discs more than 400' and anyone can Learn to hit a golf ball 300 yds. Golf is all about technique and baseball takes some abnormal physical abilities to throw a baseball more than about 80 mph and no human should ever be able to throw a baseball more than about 105 mph because of our anatomy.
Someone earlier said that people that throw 350-400' start out close to that from the beginning; That is absolutely false for me. I started playing disc golf about 2 yrs ago and I didn't break 200' for almost 2 months. The next spring I broke 300' and after about a year and 2 month of playing I hit 400'. Last fall I hit 400' with a teebird (all of these are golf lines). I learned the technique and am now striving to get the full "hit" because right now I believe I am only getting half of it.
BTW, I also play golf and baseball and I learned to hit 300 yd drives in golf. After playing baseball for 12 yrs, my fastest pitch I threw was 76 mph. My elbow can't bend enough to throw any faster. Also, for reference, I am 5'9" and 130 lbs.
This thread has been a great read.
I didn't want to be the first to say it, but there's definitely some oat here. To throw a putter that far and perfectly straight would be a feat, but your throw here was basically a big ole turnover. You've obviously got power to spare (wish I could buy some from ya, lol), but you might be better off tightening up your technique. One thing I noticed was that your reachback is a little inconsistent. You go from very high to really low and then to more or less level. From where you start the pull (very low), in order to have a consistent and straight pull, you would have to finish high, like SW said.
That's mostly what I'm saying. If you can really "hit it" then you can drive 400', easy.So u say as long as u can 'hit' it then u can drive 400'?
It's not that they don't matter at all, it's that they're not required to throw that far. More strength and longer arms will help someone who's hitting it to throw farther, but they won't make someone who's not hitting it throw as far as someone who is.I'm sure u know more about disc golf than me, but I know myself better than anyone and I don't see myself throwing even close to that far. I do know that strength and natural athletic ability matters. Why would these two things matter in every other sport and athletic endeavor but not for disc golf??
That's perfectly fine. It's also outside the scope of this thread. This thread isn't about the only way to play disc golf, it's about what it takes to have the type of power that katchz (and several others) has.But frankly I couldn't care less if I'm never able throw that far and certainly will never lose a minute of sleep over it. If it's as elusive as u say it is, then I certainly don't want to spend the years that it takes to 'get' it. I'd rather spend my time developing other shots than just trying to shoot these kind of distances. Maybe u and others take this sport more seriously than I do and will want to put in the time it takes to achieve these distances.
No worries. I was going to post something similar. I hope anyone I'm arguing with isn't taking it personally, either. I'm just trying to dispel common myths about what it really takes to throw far.Garu, I know we've been having a back and forth thing right now, but this is not just directed at you. I've been noticing a real Us v. Them thing on here lately (but going back awhile really) regarding how far you can throw or how far people think you should be able to throw.
For the record I'm not saying that most people will be able to throw like that. I'm saying that most people have the physical ability to do it. A vast majority of disc golfer's won't "get it." Hopefully, because of thread like this and drills like the hammer pound drill, more people will be able to throw like this than before. It used to be that you pretty much just had to "get it" from the start. There wasn't a way to reliably teach it. Some of us want that to change and every little bit helps.I think this is one of the worst things for new people coming into the sport to witness. They come on here and see the distances that some people can throw and feel they will never measure up because they're no where close to those distances.
I think most adult males can learn to throw 350' with fairway drivers as long as they do it right. That's something that can be taught with a high success rate. Fewer, but many more than before, will hit 400' now that we have the hammer pound drills. Way fewer still will learn to throw like katchz but that doesn't mean that no one should try.Most people who can throw 350-400+ start out throwing pretty close to those distances. That's great and yeah, maybe I am sometimes jealous.
We can't tell anyone how to enjoy the game. What we can do is give accurate information so people who do find it fun to try to perfect their throw. It's super easy to not do this stuff if you don't find it fun. It's extremely difficult to do this stuff if no one talks about it. There's no reason not to have this information out there. It's up to everyone as individuals to do what they want with it. If you don't want to throw like that, don't work on it. If you do, here's a bunch of great information that will help.But I don't think we need to make new players feel like they need to throw this far to be able to play and enjoy the game!
The hammer pound drills are the only way I know to teach this stuff. You should focus on those.I'm following the discussion, and am quite intrigued by what seems to be the accepted fact that, tangential elements of the throw aside, he's nailing the important part, the hit. While the original description attempted to describe this part, I'm still not sure exactly what I should be focusing on...the key elements of the "good" part. The resulting discussion has danced around what NOT to focus on in the video while really only referring to the fact that he's got the hit right...not(at least that I've been able to decipher) what it is that he's doing right and how I can relate that to what I'm seeing in the video.
Would anyone like to take a stab at summarizing the element(s) that I should be focusing on here, and what I should be looking for in the video that demonstrates it?
Exactly! That's what "full hitting" it means.On topic - the most amazing thing to me about kachtz's putter drive was watching the disc pivot all the way around his pinch grip at the end of the throw. Freaking amazing! I definitely need to work on that. Keep posting anytime you want, some of us appreciate it.
It is that simple. It's just not that easy to learn.I just still have a problem with the whole notion of this big 'secret' and that if I somehow manage to figure it all out, I will throwing these big distances. I doubt that it's that simple.
It's not that we're saying, "Anyone can learn it," it's that we're saying, "Adult males have the physical ability to learn it." It's not physical ability that's holding you back, it's that you aren't "hitting it" right. Anyone who has the drive to really work on it will be able to do it, it's just that few have that drive. Here's a thread at DGR about it:Threads like this are helpful, but it's not helpful to say "anybody can learn to throw for the distance Katzch is getting."
My understanding is that anyone can learn to hit a golf ball 300 yards. You just have to work really hard to do it.Or "anybody can learn to hit a golf ball 300 yards."
It's not. There are plenty of disc golfers who don't meet any of those criteria that can throw far.I actually think it's more about having long arms, flexible limbs, elastic sinews, and fast-twitch muscles, and this seems to be more common in ectomorphs than in mesomorphs or endomorphs.
Maybe not 400', but really close. It really does mean that you'll be able to throw far, but it's a called "secret" for a reason. It's not easy for most people to do.Just because you discovered "the secret" doesn't mean you're going to throw putters 400' any more than me learning perfect pitching technique is going to have me throwing 90mph.
We aren't talking about setting world records here. Er, wait, we are. Remember that the 6th longest throw on record was performed by a 12 year old boy.You can train any horse to run faster, but a Clydesdale is never going to win the Belmont. All I'm saying is that setting unrealistic raw distance goals for people who don't have the right kind of athletic talent is going to lead to as much frustration as anything.
That's kind of a weird question because if you can control it, then you can throw without it. The goal is to be able to throw with as much or as little as you'd ever need in both directions with as much control as possibleI read through this whole thread and I have one question pertaining to OAT. If an individuals form has OAT in it but they understand that and know how to control and use it does it matter?
We aren't talking about setting world records here. Er, wait, we are. Remember that the 6th longest throw on record was performed by a 12 year old boy.