JR
* Ace Member *
Wouldn't a River be a closer comparison to the FD? Don't have FDs.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
JR said:Wouldn't a River be a closer comparison to the FD? Don't have FDs.
You and me both.linkinparkervii said:I really wish there wasnt snow and wasnt soo cold out. I really want to throw my FD. 175 orange
discspeed said:JR said:Wouldn't a River be a closer comparison to the FD? Don't have FDs.
The River in general is more nose angle and speed sensitive than the FD. It also turns and fades more. The River was one of the hardest discs I've learned to shape exact lines consistently...If I got it turning, either by speed or nose/release angle, it stayed turned most the time. I had a hell of a time getting powered down shots that would turn a little and fade consistently. This same shot was repeatable for me with the FD almost from the get-go.
discspeed said:I'm using it mostly for technical shots in the woods, and these shots are holding their line with very little push/high speed turn with a gliding fade that starts to kick in about 3/4 of the way through the flight. These holes range from a little over 300' to about 340'. Past 340' I start to see high speed turn. I haven't worked with it enough at the next power level as it starts to overlap with my TD/PDs, but powered down it is a hell of a fairway driver.