I want to see WR Jackson on coverage more. I don't want to get tired of seeing it. It'd stay fresh to me (and I'm guessing many others) much longer than other courses. But I wonder if we saw it every year for 10 years, would we still say the same thing?
I'm a much bigger fan of rotating courses on and off the tour. There are so many new championship courses being built. They need to have smaller tournaments first in order to work out the kinks of running a tourney on them, but I'd love to see them come onto the tour within a few years. Houck has 3 that he's specifically designed specifically with the pro tour in mind (not all are finished). I think the Eagle's crossing course is slightly over-hyped, but I still want to see it on the pro tour. Plus, all of the courses that are yet to be started.
I guess what I'm saying is I'd love to see WR Jackson on the tour every year right now, but in 3-5 years I'd hope that there were enough other good courses that it rotated on and off.
As a side note: Anyone know of any courses being designed with with the intent of maintaining variety on the same course? I know Winthrop Gold has changed over time to maintain variety; I'm more thinking of a non-wide-open-OB-laden course. Perhaps it'd have 3-5 tee and pin locations for each level, so there are 9+ combinations of how to play each hole? Or perhaps the first iteration they establish holes with large amounts of space between them so they can create other fairways/lanes over time?