Ha, It seems to be common for people to discuss where Paul should play. Figured I would fan the flames. I think Paul should play where ever he wants as long as he wants and he knows that. Now "Joseph Priest"... that guy does need to go Pro. 996 rated signed up for Am Nats...
-
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
2012 Worlds Completely Filled!
- Thread starter DGRZ001
- Start date
And I have no problem with Paul playing AM. He came up to Pittsburgh a few years agoto play in our league. We played Deer Lakes, he set the new course record. Then I finished my round a few minutes after him, and set the NEW course record. What an AM. lol
No Paul is a good guy and he can play where he feels comfortable. He is the next Estenfelder.
No Paul is a good guy and he can play where he feels comfortable. He is the next Estenfelder.
jcrab66
Double Eagle Member
i cant wait to get there and try out these worlds courses!
it'll be fun!!
There is an updated waitlist, dated today. I'd post the link, but I navigated away from the page and it's taking foreverrrrrrrrr to load.
Spinthrift
Eagle Member
Wait list and current registration:
http://www.pdga.com/2012worlds/waitlist-update-05-15
http://www.pdga.com/2012worlds/waitlist-update-05-15
jcrab66
Double Eagle Member
man that wait list is confusing having all the divisions mixed together...
DGRZ001
Eagle Member
It still shows the 4/30 date with no update after the open period started.
chopz33
Eagle Member
Spinthrift
Eagle Member
Someone on PDGA board said the same thing when he used Firefox browser; switched to Explorer and said new list opened fine.
Empty your browser cache and then the browser will have to go out and get the new page.
walker
Par Member
Yeah, separate the divisions and some numbering would be nice. I think I'm somewhere around 100th for Am 1.
tjdub26936
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2011
- Messages
- 4
Looks like there's a new schedule and they somehow figured out how to add 26 more slots. Originally, they were going to take 1008 players (72 x 14 courses). Then they juggled schedules and eventually hit 1099 for a while. Now the total slots stand at 1125, if my math is right.
They added mostly juniors (18), pro seniors (4), and pro master/grandmaster women (4). Interestingly, there were two former world champs on the wait list and now, magically, there are enough slots to accommodate them. Cynics might say there is no registration deadline if you're really good, but I'm sure this was just a happy scheduling coincidence.
They added mostly juniors (18), pro seniors (4), and pro master/grandmaster women (4). Interestingly, there were two former world champs on the wait list and now, magically, there are enough slots to accommodate them. Cynics might say there is no registration deadline if you're really good, but I'm sure this was just a happy scheduling coincidence.
There's another subtle difference here. They're showing how some of the divisions match up to fill the courses. For example, if MM1 combines with MJ1 they don't fill all 144 slots on the two courses MM1 is split across. That means if MJ1 doesn't use all 30 spots allotted to it those spots can be filled by MM1 players. The clue here is the "c" that's on the outside of the division boxes. Divisions that don't have a "c" next to them share courses during pool play, so they can also share tee spots. All of this, of course, is my interpretation from 2,000 miles away.
Question is: when do they decide if MJ1 won't use all of its spots? Monday of tournament week?
Question is: when do they decide if MJ1 won't use all of its spots? Monday of tournament week?
Cgkdisc
.:Hall of Fame Member:.
MM1 is not limited by MJ1 but shares other courses with pools like MS1 (Y) with 36. They fill some courses with the additional 36 MM1 in pool Q. No more room in MM1 unless MS1 drops below 36 which is highly unlikely at this point. The latest schedule increases came mostly from increasing "soft caps" where possible in some smaller divisions that hadn't already filled their course assignments with 72 players. I think all of those have been expanded to hard caps in V1.7 at this point.
If they were all hard caps, wouldn't there be a "c" next to all the divisions?
And thanks, Chuck, for being willing to speak up. It's surprising to me how little communication we're getting regarding the wait list status.
And thanks, Chuck, for being willing to speak up. It's surprising to me how little communication we're getting regarding the wait list status.
Cgkdisc
.:Hall of Fame Member:.
The "c" caps were there initially for big pool divisions that couldn't be exceeded but haven't been added when hard caps were reached for other smaller divisions.
Similar threads
