biscoe
* Ace Member *
If there were a cap of par+4 then I would say par +5 should be the minimum for not playing a hole at all. (Since we don't cap scores I still believe DQ is the appropriate penalty.) There should never be a circumstance where not playing is preferable to playing.The rule about multiple penalties says: "A throw or an action that is subject to penalty under more than one rule..."
One action (like oversleeping) could trigger both the 5 minute and absent rules. I would find it hard to justify giving both penalties in that case.
If the player checked in late, and then disappeared, I would call that two different actions and add the two penalty throws on top of the par plus 4.
As for whether it should be DQ to miss a hole, that is the most logically consistent way to handle it. Being nice and letting players play on with a par+4 would be logically consistent if par+4 were the scoring cap for ALL holes.
IMO the "action" is not the same either way. "Action 1" is being somewhere other than the appropriate place during check in which is prior to the beginning of play. "Action 2" is being somewhere other than the appropriate place when it is 30 seconds past your turn to tee.
I don't see the logic behind a larger penalty for late check in and then missing a hole vs no check in at all and missing a hole. The more egregious of the 2 (imo) gets a lesser penalty?