Casey 1988
Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
all my buzzes are dead straight with small fade
As they should be.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
all my buzzes are dead straight with small fade
all my buzzes are dead straight with small fade
I Think the Buzzz should have 5 5 0 1
a few numbers in the new flightchart that feels a bit of
What do people like for backhand roller? I'm considering the z express or maybe a heat (or even an XL). Right now I throw the mongoose exclusively for rollers.
big gap in the discraft lineup speed wise between the buzz os and the predator. would love for them to bring back the X2 or similar disc.
I Think the Buzzz should have 5 5 0 1
a few numbers in the new flightchart that feels a bit of
They have the Roach at "2 4 0 1" and "0" with the "old" numbers . . .But the "0,5" Buzzz at "5 4 -1 1"
So the Buzzz is more stable than the Roach according too the old numbers . . but less stable with the new numbering system?!
The Judge by DD has 2 4 0 1 and the Roach is not that stable
The Avenger SS at 0,5 got 10 5 -3 1 with the new system . . . "-3 1" is a very understable disc . . "0,5" is not. . most other "-3 1" discs had "-0,5" with the old system
Surge had 1,7 and Surge SS had 1,5, quite a small difference ....10 5 -1 3 vs 10 5 -2 2 feels like a big differens
it is a horrid layout its crap like this that makes people look past discraft
People were looking past Discraft already, for not having a four-number system. At least they're doing that now.
And yeah, I'd rather they have Valarie's picture there instead of Nate's...
Methinks they took a lot of the four-number numbers from sites like Infinite and DiscGolfCenter, and those numbers don't seem to correlate well with Discraft's original one-number system. And again, we can pick nits here and there, but in some cases it's comparing apples and oranges, and in other cases it's all relative not absolute, just as Trilogy and Innova's numbers aren't perfectly correlated.
TL; DR: It's good Discraft is going to the four-number system. :thmbup:
I like that Discraft starts with the 4-number system, and for most part the numbers are ok, The Zone at 4 3 0 3 is perfect, that´s NOT a 3-speed disc.
But the Buzz is Discraft most known disc, and i Think the 5 4 -1 1 is of. . Infinife Disc has the Buzz at 5 5 -0,1 1 that´s more accurate
My most stable Buzz Ti is more like 5 5 0 2 buts thats Another story
I notice there is a disc I haven't heard or seen anything about yet,
The Sting?
Leopard type? Maybe?
Last year's Ace Race disc.
They have the Roach at "2 4 0 1" and "0" with the "old" numbers . . .But the "0,5" Buzzz at "5 4 -1 1"
So the Buzzz is more stable than the Roach according too the old numbers . . but less stable with the new numbering system?!
The Judge by DD has 2 4 0 1 and the Roach is not that stable