Your statement aligns with the thought that a soft, tacky putter is going to stick to chains better, right? Or that such and such putter or style of putting is more prone to spit outs or cut throughs, or rollaways or long come-backers etc. I would of course say all else held equal, its best to mitigate the likelihood of any of the above results occurring. However, how far are you willing to deviate from the specific putter that feels best in your hand; the one that you get the most consistent release and flight from? That is to say, how much consistency/accuracy are you willing to sacrifice to lower your percentage of chain outs, for example? If given the choice of a slippery lucid judge that I feel comfortable with, vs a supersoft classic judge that is way less likely to cut through or roll, but that I am much less comfortable with, I'll go with the lucid every time. (this is just an example - I prefer prime
) Same for if someone is able to find the chains with the Sonic more often than a beveled edge disc, it would make sense to putt with the Sonic to me, unless the threat of big rollaways and epic chain outs was ridiculously high, which is just not the case.
EDIT: not advocating for anyone to try putting with the Sonic - I agree that the beveled edge is clearly superior and I would hope for my sake that I would be more comfortable and accurate with an Aviar anyway.