I know that there are several Tracker threads already, but after receiving this disc from Marshall Street it's pretty clear that the Ledgestone CryZtal FLX Tracker is a totally different product.
It's got a flight rating of 3+ on the Discraft scale and the Ledgestone is deserving of it. Insanely overstable. (The original Z runs have a 1.8.)
This has got to be a new mold:
1. It's zipper topped, whereas the old Z and ESP Trackers I own are from a smooth, polished mold.
2. The top is FAF. Flatter than the Discraft Flick. It's almost as flat as a Zone. The lack of dome on the Ledgestone FLX Tracker can't be attributed to the soft plastic alone.
3. The lower edge of the wing is a much steeper angle on the Ledgestone than in the original Z and ESP Trackers.
4. As with all new Discraft releases, it's got the updated tooling on the inner rim. Old Trackers had no tooling at all.
Should this disc still be called a Tracker???
There's mention that this disc is more overstable than a Flick. Definitely is.
A few more pics:
It's got a flight rating of 3+ on the Discraft scale and the Ledgestone is deserving of it. Insanely overstable. (The original Z runs have a 1.8.)
This has got to be a new mold:
1. It's zipper topped, whereas the old Z and ESP Trackers I own are from a smooth, polished mold.
2. The top is FAF. Flatter than the Discraft Flick. It's almost as flat as a Zone. The lack of dome on the Ledgestone FLX Tracker can't be attributed to the soft plastic alone.
3. The lower edge of the wing is a much steeper angle on the Ledgestone than in the original Z and ESP Trackers.
4. As with all new Discraft releases, it's got the updated tooling on the inner rim. Old Trackers had no tooling at all.
Should this disc still be called a Tracker???
There's mention that this disc is more overstable than a Flick. Definitely is.
A few more pics: