A question for you Destroyer throwers...

[iowapat]

A ridge in the top.

if youve ever held a vulcan,youll be able to tel the difference between them because of that top

thanks for the info...

 

[Star Shark]

A regular Destroyer top is slightly convex from outer edge to flight plate. The Vulcan top is flat the whole way.

 

[bullet]

Got a 171g FR Destroyer from a friend.

Is this rarer or something because of the red circles?
Not selling it but just out of curiosity, what's it worth?

 

[Frank Delicious]

thats a pretty ugly disc.

 

[booter]

finally got to see the vulcan topped destroyers this past saturday. its easily different than the other destroyers. there were a couple at our pias

 

[dehaas]

I was skimming eBay a few days who and saw some champ destroyers in the 163-166 range and don't remember seeing them that light. I was curious about the dome and got a chance to feel one this weekend. Super flat and kind of gummy...didn't get a chance to throw it though.

 

[niuvalleycane]

need to find some of my fave bomber champ destroyers, they were tfrs 168g or 169g stiff with dome(and glide) like a Pro Destroyer, slower than a FR but great glide and stable enough for moderate winds, did i mention the glide 8)

 

[dehaas]

I bought an x out 168 from dgv maybe 3 years ago that sounds like what you're talking about. Once it broke in it flew really nice. I've thought about mailing them and asking if they had any left but am hesitant with everybody saying their account info has been getting jacked.

 

[booter]

Its more prone to get jacked if ur using a cc

 

[zj10021]

which PIAS booter

 

[booter]

Southside! It was blue I think. Aj stamp

 

[RobD]

Vulcan top+destroyer bottom= Archon.....99% sure of this

 

[HeartlessCynic]

Vulcan top+destroyer bottom= Archon.....99% sure of this

Nope. Vulcan top + Wraith bottom = Archon. That is why the protos have VW written on the underside.

 

[discspeed]

Vulcan top+destroyer bottom= NEW RUN DESTROYERS.....99% sure of this

Fixed.

 

[booter]

Vulcan top+destroyer bottom= Archon.....99% sure of this

I think u need to just need to read 99% more before posting

 

[RobD]

I don't have the time or the inclination to read through all the content here, just stumbled across this and posted what I was told by a pro this weekend. Hope the world doesn't end cause I made a mistake on a message board post

 

[booter]

Suuure. Blame it on the pro he Must of been a discraft pro. Thanks for ending the world btw

 

[fanter]

I'm not a big Destroyer thrower, and I don't usually throw base plastic, but I have a 167 DX Destroyer that was one of my first discs ever. I pulled it from obscurity yesterday, made some POST PRODUCTION MODIFICATIONS (tuned it to make it more stable) and pegged a basket from 380'. It was still stupid fast for having nicks in the rim and stupid straight after the bending. I might be convinced that a DX Destroyer is worth having around.

 

[Billym]

Funny thing is that Destroyers actually mold up well in DX and when they break in they get big D. If you wack a lot of trees (why are you throwing a destroyer?) they will get trashed pretty fast but skips and landings don't beat them up that badly. Destroyers are one of the few high speed drivers that work well in DX well at least until the moment they break in too much.

 

[himynameismatt]

I think the thing about DX Destroyers is that the Pro ones are only a couple bucks more a disc and with that you get the added durability of Pro at the speed at I throw them the DX's will nick up and chip on rough ground or small rocks, which can get annoying. Plus as we all know the Pro's are notorious bombers. The DX's are fun to throw though I have one that's the domiest disc I own goes for days when I get a hold of it.