jubuttib
* Ace Member *
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2009
- Messages
- 6,513
That's not a big gap, stability or distance wise.money 21 said:supposed to be between a stalker and a buzz.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
That's not a big gap, stability or distance wise.money 21 said:supposed to be between a stalker and a buzz.
Discrafts statement not mine.jubuttib said:That's not a big gap, stability or distance wise.money 21 said:supposed to be between a stalker and a buzz.
Those may be the worst Cyclones ever produced.JHern said:money 21 said:the x-clone was great and would fit the bill. the regular cyclone is nowhere near overstable as i am thinking of.JHern said:money 21 said:any guesses? Just for fun and a shot in the dark the hole i see in the discraft line up would be between the preditor and the hornet. a stalker os
They have one of these, it's called the Cyclone, and it's the best-selling disc of all time.
Speaking of which, we should start a movement to have them run the X-Clone again, in rigid ESP plastic.
Then you probably haven't tried the flat ESP Cyclones...much faster and over-stable than the old variety.
tried a flat clone the other day it was ok fh but hated it bh.Jesse B 707 said:Those may be the worst Cyclones ever produced.JHern said:money 21 said:the x-clone was great and would fit the bill. the regular cyclone is nowhere near overstable as i am thinking of.JHern said:money 21 said:any guesses? Just for fun and a shot in the dark the hole i see in the discraft line up would be between the preditor and the hornet. a stalker os
They have one of these, it's called the Cyclone, and it's the best-selling disc of all time.
Speaking of which, we should start a movement to have them run the X-Clone again, in rigid ESP plastic.
Then you probably haven't tried the flat ESP Cyclones...much faster and over-stable than the old variety.
interesting... thought it was more like a less stable XL. Mine turns pretty easy, I guess sort of like an XL after some use but most new XLs I've thrown don't turn as easy as this. Not a horrible disc though... I've been comparing it's flight to my used dx eagle.BIF13 said:I think it flies like a more stable XL, just me though.
money 21 said:played the ace race to day had a good time but am having a hard time with a description of the disc, a hornet ss maybe. thrown flat the disc will turn and come back late. power down and you cane throw it very straight with a late hard but forward penitrating fade with a lot of glide.
I agree with both of these.money 21 said:really liking this disc. it helps with form because you don't want to musle it and it doesn't fly well at all if your release is not clean. How ever if you get a smooth clean release this disc is amazing flies the line you tell it to and has just sick glide.
money 21 said:just held it side by side with a squall and can't tell the difference.
as a big squall fan myself i agree almost all of what you said but IMO the ar12 has a bit more glide and is getting out about 10'-15' farther for me. the ar12 seems to have more dome so i bet they did just a little tweak like a nose spacer. Eveything else you stated i agree with. The squall is one of the most over looked disc on the market. picked up a couple new proline squalls the other day and the feel and look like the old opague z plastic that the storms came in as well as the first run flick. they have a touch more HSS and hold lines great.JHern said:money 21 said:just held it side by side with a squall and can't tell the difference.
Yep, I was just working with one of these, and I can also testify that it looks, feels, and flies like a Squall (note that Discraft molds the Squall for DGA). If there is a difference, I couldn't see it. Any differences in flight fell within the usual variation in flights from one plastic to another plastic for the same mold. As Discraft said, the Squall is a tad longer than a Buzzz because it will turn over a tick more and hold its angle through the glidey portion of the flight a bit longer, and is a tad slower than a Stalker. The Squall is better than either the Buzzz or Stalker for working various lines, it really shines in the hyzer-flip and turnover categories. Like the Buzzz, the Squall rim is very nice for gripping.
Note that I absolutely love the Squall, especially the SP (sparkle) Squall. But I'm not sure I understand why Discraft would begin marketing the same disc in their own line-up. I'll ask around and see what's up with that.