- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
- Messages
- 22,008
I just watched the day 1 wrap up show on the Spin tv channel . Wow!
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I just watched the day 1 wrap up show on the Spin tv channel . Wow!
Anyone know why the qualifying round scores looked so good. It appeared that a 63 was the minimal for qualifying but I dam well know that those guys are not shooting any where near that at the actual tourney.
Just a guess...weather.
.
.
There's also what I'd call the reset factor.
.
.
Or they just had a bad round and will bounce back today.
Great wrap up show JT. Very slick, Patrick Brown is a natural on camera as well.
One request, please please get two mics so you two don't look like you're interviewing each other! It's weird!
Innova owns the U.S. event, not the sport/PDGA.
Honestly how can the PDGA say they own any event, when they aren't the ones doing the majority of funding for them?
These events (Memorial, BSF, USDGC, World's, etc) would cease to exist if the manufacturers and local clubs stopped doing the work and fundraising.
I realize the PDGA provides support and some funding, but the bulk of the work and money doesn't come from them.
Honestly how can the PDGA say they own any event, when they aren't the ones doing the majority of funding for them?
These events (Memorial, BSF, USDGC, World's, etc) would cease to exist if the manufacturers and local clubs stopped doing the work and fundraising.
I realize the PDGA provides support and some funding, but the bulk of the work and money doesn't come from them.
This was important for a number of reasons but largely driven by the then #1 request from the membership for the PDGA to bring in national-level sponsors.
This was important for a number of reasons but largely driven by the then #1 request from the membership for the PDGA to bring in national-level sponsors.
Ahhhhh,#TBT to the (in)famous Player Survey. How I wished that the Board would rise above the starry-eyed fantasies of the frisbee golfing dreamers, and actually do what was best for the game. But it wasn't meant to be. Good times.
I'll bite, what's best for the game? Just curious.
Also, what is the game? That is, doing what's best for what? Is the goal the am game, growing the pro game, getting more money?
BTW - those things were asked in the (in)famous Player Survey. The PDGA sort of follows those things. Are you saying they shouldn't?
The charter of most any member-run not-for-profit organization essentially states they exist to serve the needs of the members. You can argue how the org goes about identifying and addressing those needs within the bounds of fiduciary responsibility. It's the nature of the beast, however, and - back then - the member survey served to identify those priorities.
I'll bite, what's best for the game? Just curious.
Also, what is the game? That is, doing what's best for what? Is the goal the am game, growing the pro game, getting more money?
BTW - those things were asked in the (in)famous Player Survey. The PDGA sort of follows those things. Are you saying they shouldn't?