I still disagree with what he's saying despite your attempt to reconcile our differences, I think the copter can get better coverage than a guy with a camera. A guy with a camera is head height so you're going to get the profile shot of the disc, it's not as aesthetically pleasing and it's harder to see the farther the disc gets away.
What coverage? Up close? Zoom in? Spin around and follow? You really want that spinning machine THAT close to you when you play?
With the copter you're above the disc and can get a lot more lateral movement than a guy with a camera can. You're going to get a better shot of the disc flying, not to mention you can get way more angles on a fairway with a copter than you can with a guy and a camera.
you're mis-reading me, there are far more ways to get shots that just a standing guy. You are right, the helicam is far superior to add that layer of depth and drama than just a guy standing there. Again, see point above.
Crane cams? How is that logistically possible to set up on 18 holes with the budget of current film crews?
Average cost of heli, avg cost of renting a boom life for a day, look it up. You'd be surprised. The answer is simple, just get both, they both add their own advantages.
A blimp? how is that better than a copter? The copter can actually fly in semi wooded areas, a blimp can't see crap in the woods. A copter gets multiple angles a blimp gets one angle.
You are really wanting to fly a heli even in a semi-wooded area? Boom lifts and basic handhelds are a better option here, and strategically placed cams on trees.
He's saying the copter can't get legit coverage of the disc well if you watch that first video I think that proves everything about what he's saying wrong. Trying to push the way ball golf is filmed on to disc golf is dumb, it's two completely different animals.